Monday, July 4, 2011

In support of the Baha'i prisoners in Iran

پشتیبانی مردم برزیل از زندانیان بهایی 
Brazilian people in support of the Baha'i prisoners in Iran
O povo brasileiro em apoio aos prisioneiros Baha'i no Irã
http://www.flickr.com//photos/sasgbahai/sets/72157627008875050//show/

Via American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER):


Dear Daniel,

Today, we reflect upon the memorable words Thomas Jefferson penned 235 years ago:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Taken together, these words define the essence of freedom.

For couples like Kris and Sandy, two of AFER’s plaintiffs challenging Prop. 8, freedom means raising their boys in a loving, stable home. It means not having to justify their relationship every time one of them tries to pick her son up from school. It means growing old together.

For couples like Jeff and Paul, the other two plaintiffs in our case, freedom means having their love recognized not only by each other, their friends, and family, but by the state. It means being able to take part in a sacred institution that is universally recognized in our country. It means supporting each other, in sickness and in health.

And for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender youth, freedom means not being judged, bullied or harassed for being labeled as different, but instead being celebrated for who they are. It means going to school without the fear of being shoved or taunted. It means living in a home where they are loved, supported and nurtured.

Fourteen times the U.S. Supreme Court has said that marriage is a fundamental right of all individuals. Two loving, committed people should be able to pursue happiness through a special kind of bond.

This Fourth of July we have much to rejoice. Soon, all couples will be able to wed in New York. Prop. 8 has been ruled unconstitutional. The barriers blocking the federal recognition of the legal marriages of gay and lesbian couples are crumbling. Never before have we been closer to realizing equality for gay and lesbian Americans.

Our fight for equality is about trying to form a more perfect union—between two people who love each other and to have that bond recognized.
For too long, this country has denied equal rights to its gay and lesbian citizens. And with your help, we will achieve full equality for all.

Happy Independence Day,



Chad Griffin Portrait Chad Griffin SignatureChad GriffinBoard President
American Foundation for Equal Rights

Sunday, July 3, 2011

Via 365Gay: Culhane: But are they “bigots”?

Share
 
, Professor of Law, Widener University
It’s been much remarked lately that those who oppose marriage equality have been trying to stand the facts of the world on their heads. In a move that’s been at least partially successful, some of them claim that what we’re trying to do is to silence them, to drive their views from “the public square” (one could create a drinking game based on Maggie Gallagher’s use of that term), and to label them “bigots.”
So they are the “victims” – not those of us who are denied basic equality. Read this recent interview with Gallagher in the wake of the New York victory – it won’t take you long to find the words “bigotry”, “silenced,” and – of course – “public square.” [Glug.]

This strategy makes sense, from their perspective. As it’s become glaringly apparent that they don’t have convincing legal or policy reasons for excluding us from the benefits of and protections of marriage, they attempt to shift the terms of the debate by labeling us intolerant.

Via Central de Notícias Gays: Casal Gay de Jacareí (SP) é o primeiro a se casar oficialmente no Brasil

Luiz André Moresi e Sérgio Kauffman Sousa

O cabeleireiro Sérgio Kauffman Sousa e o comerciante Luiz André Moresi retiraram no Cartório de Registro Civil de Jacareí, a certidão do primeiro casamento civil Gay do Brasil.

O documento é consequência de uma decisão do juiz Fernando Henrique Pinto, da 2ª Vara da Família e das Sucessões do município, que converteu a união estável deles em casamento. O fato histórico ocorreu bem no Dia Mundial do Orgulho Gay, 28 de junho.

Os dois se emocionaram durante a rápida cerimônia de registro civil. A mesa colocada para assinar o documento foi adornada com a bandeira colorida símbolo do Movimento LGBT. Depois da cerimônia, eles trocaram alianças, se beijaram e abriram um champanhe.

Durante discurso, Luiz André dedicou o casamento aos militantes, à Justiça em Jacareí e aos ministros do Supremo Tribunal Federal. “Estamos fazendo história”, disse Luiz. “Desde adolescente, eu queria casar, mas não com uma mulher. É um conto de fadas realizado”, disse Sérgio.

Quem também discursou foi o promotor de registros de Jacareí José Luiz Bednarski. Ele lembrou que na Constituição homens e mulheres são iguais e têm os mesmos direitos garantidos. Durante o discurso que emocionou o casal, ele afirmou que espera “que essa semente plantada hoje no futuro se transforme em uma grande árvore”.

Segundo o Tribunal de Justiça de São Paulo e a Associação Brasileira de Gays, Lésbicas e Transgêneros (ABGLT), é o primeiro caso de casamento civil Homoafetivo no país. Com a decisão, os dois se tornaram oficialmente casados e passarão a usar o mesmo sobrenome: Sousa Moresi.

“É uma felicidade imensa. Ainda estou tentando compreender esse momento histórico. A ficha precisa cair que esse é um momento que vai ficar na história. A gente luta por tantos anos e quando acontece, a gente entra em êxtase. É por isso que eu divido e dedico essa vitória a todos os militantes”, contou Luiz André.

Segundo Kauffman, o casamento civil chega após oito anos de união estável. No dia 17 de maio, eles foram ao cartório oficializar a união. No dia 6 de junho, pediram a conversão da união em casamento civil.

Segundo o TJ, o Ministério Público deu parecer favorável ao pedido, que “foi instruído com declaração de duas testemunhas, que confirmaram que os dois ‘mantêm convivência pública, contínua e duradoura e estabelecida com o objetivo de constituir família’.”

De acordo com o TJ, a decisão do juiz Fernando Henrique Pinto tem como principal fundamento o julgamento do Supremo Tribunal Federal, de 5 de maio, que reconheceu a união estável de pessoas do mesmo sexo como entidade familiar.

O juiz disse que, com o casamento, os dois passam a ter os direitos garantidos após a morte de um deles. "Quando há a união estável, você tem de provar quando um falece que esta união valia na data da morte. Com o casamento, basta apresentar a certidão. É uma garantia. Tanto que faço a recomendação a todos os casais, Homossexuais ou heterossexuais, que vivam em união estável para que se casem."

Gay Soldier's Parents Fight Minnesota's Marriage Ban

Via Miami Herald: Brazil judge OKs country's first gay marriage

Associated Press

A Brazilian state judge on Monday approved what the court said is the nation's first gay marriage.

Sao Paulo state Judge Fernando Henrique Pinto ruled two men could convert their civil union into a full marriage. Brazil's Supreme Court cleared the way in May for the recognition of same-sex civil unions, but stopped short of approving gay marriages.

A court statement said Pinto made the decision based on the top court's ruling on civil unions and on Brazil's constitution, which outlines how a civil union can be converted into a legal marriage.

Benjamin Polastri, a spokesman with the Sao Paulo state Attorney General's Office, said it was not immediately clear if the ruling set a strong national precedent. Polastri also said the just-approved gay marriage was the first for South America's biggest nation.

Jose Luiz Bednarski, a lawyer for the Sao Paulo state attorney general, said in an opinion presented to Pinto that the marriage was legal.

"The federal constitution establishes as a fundamental objective of the Federal Republic of Brazil to promote the good of everyone without bias of gender or any other form of discrimination," Bednarski wrote. "This certainly includes the choice or sexual orientation of a person."

In the Brazilian legal system, judges often seek the opinion of a state or federal attorney general about a case.

Read more: http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/27/2287957/brazil-judge-approves-countrys.html#ixzz1R2yclV5h

Via JMG: RHODE ISLAND: Gov. Lincoln Chafee Signs Civil Unions Bill Into Law


Against the vehement objections of some LGBT rights groups, today Rhode Island Gov. Lincoln Chafee signed his state's controversial civil unions bill into law.
The new law includes a section that says no religious organization -- including some hospitals, cemeteries, schools and community centers -- or its employees may be required to treat as valid any civil union, providing a religious exemption "of unparalleled and alarming scope," Chafee said in a statement. As a result, a civil union spouse could be denied the right to make medical decisions for his or her partner, access to health insurance benefits, property rights in adjoining burial plots or family memberships at some community centers. That could cause partners significant harm at critical moments in their lives, the governor said. "This extraordinary exemption eviscerates the important rights that enacting a civil union law was meant to guarantee for same sex couples in the first place," Chafee said.

reposted from Joe

Saturday, July 2, 2011

Via JMG: Nate Silver: California Voters Would Overturn Proposition 8 In 2012


Elections prognosticator Nate Silver has published another super-complicated voting trends analysis. Even though there's no plan to place a repeal of Prop 8 on the 2012 California ballot, Silver predicts that voters would overturn the measure if given the chance.
Even the relatively cautious Linear Model predicts that 54 percent of Californians would vote against a measure like Proposition 8 if one were on the ballot next year, while 55 percent of Oregonians would vote against a ban on same-sex marriage like the one the state’s voters approved in 2004. Neither prediction seems too far out of line: Oregon’s marriage ban was rejected by 43 percent of voters seven years ago, and California’s by 48 percent two years ago, and public opinion has shifted meaningfully in favor of same-sex marriage since then.

reposted from Joe

Cory Monteith is Straight But Not Narrow

Via JMG: Matt Foreman: Celebrating Our Gains


Former NGLTF executive director Matt Foreman takes to the Huffington Post today for a thoughtful essay on why we continue to see hard-fought gains in the LGBT movement. An excerpt:
While opponents of LGBT rights have at least eight national advocacy organizations with budgets of more than $10 million, the LGBT movement has just one. In fact, the annual budget of just one of the biggest opponents of LGBT rights, Focus on the Family/CitizenLink, is greater than the budgets of the 39 largest LGBT advocacy, legal and research organizations, combined. So what explains the continued traction that the LGBT movement has enjoyed in the face of such adversity? There are a lot of related factors. For example, more LGBT people are coming out and more non-LGBT people are getting to know them and are themselves becoming advocates for equal rights. There is also the influence of popular culture and celebrities, the high profile of LGBT issues in the media, and the vibrant presence of LGBT bloggers in social media. But the legal and policy advances of the last decade did not spring miraculously from the results of a public opinion poll or a single heartfelt, pro-gay acceptance speech at the Oscars. Instead, they happened because LGBT organizations made them happen.
Read the full article.


reposted from Joe

Via JMG: Countdown - Michelle Bachmann's Anti-Gay Husband Exposed

Via JMG: Cher Rips Marcus Bachmann


(Via - Towleroad)


reposted from Joe

Via AmericaBlogGay: Michele Bachmann's husband/strategist: Gays are "barbarians" who need education, discipline

Listen for yourself to the latest attack the LGBT community from the Bachmann family. This one comes from her husband, Dr. Marcus Bachmann, who like his wife, seems particularly obsessed with the LGBT community:
As first reported by the Think Progress blog, Marcus Bachmann, who in March was described by former Minnesota Republican Party Chairman Ron Carey as part of Michele's "brain trust," was a guest on the Christian-based "Point of View" radio talk show on May 12, 2010, where he came out strongly against the LGBT community.

"We have to understand: Barbarians need to be educated. They need to be disciplined. Just because someone feels it or thinks it doesn’t mean that we are supposed to go down that road. That’s what is called the sinful nature. We have a responsibility as parents and as authority figures not to encourage such thoughts and feelings from moving into the action steps," Marcus Bachmann said.
Dr. Bachmann sure sounds like an advocate for ex-gay therapy,which he has promoted that in the past, via Think Progress: Along with offering faith-based counseling at his clinic, Bachmann also gives presentations at various conferences. In November 2005, he and Rep. Bachmann both ran sessions at a “Minnesota Pastors’ Summit” in Eden Prairie, Minnesota: hers focused on the gay marriage amendment she was trying to push through the state legislature, and his was titled “The Truth About the Homosexual Agenda.”

One of the people present for Dr. Bachmann’s talk almost had to leave the room because “there was so much bile.” Curt Prins, a marketing executive who identifies as gay, reported that Bachmann believed homosexuality was a “choice” rather than due to genetics:
The climax of the presentation was when, according to Prins, Bachmann brought up “three ex-gays, like part of a PowerPoint presentation.” The trio, two white men and a black woman, all testified that they had renounced their homosexuality. “One of them said, ‘If I was born gay, then I’ll have to be born again,’” Prins recalls. “The crowd went crazy.”
Now, listen:



Got that? We "gay barbarians," need to be disciplined?!!? Okay.

Via AmericaBlogGay: It's inevitable

Leading Nevada Conservative: "gay marriage is coming. Nationwide. It's inevitable"

Via The Strip Podcast, an interesting development on marriage from a hard-core conservative -- just as the GOPers are planning their presidential debate:
As the New York State Legislature works into the night on a track to become the largest state to grant marriage equality to same-sex couples, the effort to make this happen in Nevada may have hit a turning point today as well.





Chuck Muth, the outspoken conservative activist whose wrath is feared by most Republican elected officials in Nevada, wrote this in his daily email blast that goes to GOPers and journalists:
Many, if not most of you won't like this but gay marriage is coming. Nationwide. It's inevitable. It's only a matter of time. It can and will be delayed, but not stopped. And eventually, it will be as acceptable as black/white marriages. The problem isn't letting gays into marriage, but having already let the government into marriage.

As an economy based almost solely on tourism and entertainment, Nevada -- and especially Las Vegas -- should accept reality, embrace the inevitable, repeal the state's ban on gay marriage, and scarf up on the tourism bonanza that would result rather than suck hind teat behind the likes of Hawaii and New York.
I suspect that Muth has uttered similar views before, but it's especially notable because this missive will be read more closely than most as it also announces that the GOP presidential debate he was helping organize has been postponed from July. And I know that Muth has never been all that interested in the Sharron Angle-Richard Ziser wing of the Nevada Republican universe because he doesn't think the guvmint belongs in personal lives any more than in anything else they're in.
It is inevitable.

Would be great to see top Democrats in Nevada, like Majority Leader Harry Reid, announce support for marriage, too.

Today's "Dude Could you please for once show Gay Folks as Normal in the Press Please!:

A touch of homophobia from the Economist

Was that photo really necessary? Choosing the most outrageous photo to symbolize their "gay" coverage is something the American press (other than Fox News) stopped doing a good decade ago. And in this case, the story is about marriage, not men who feel the need to walk half-naked in public.  It's hard to believe a magazine like the Economist (which I once wrote for as a stringer) would have the poor taste to publish that photo with this story.





As an aside, I think guy in the photo is a moron for dressing like that in public. It seriously doesn't help the cause of marriage, not to mention, who needs to see you in your thong anyway? But there's no excuse for the Economist choosing a sensational photo of a half-naked faux gay married couple to basically diminish the seriousness of its own story, and worse, our desire to be treated equally by the state.


UPDATE: A twitterer noted that the Economist has long supported gay marriage, and even did a cover story on it. And that's great. I'm not trying to say that they're a bunch of homophobes, but the choice of this photo for this story was homophobic. It's a problem we had to deal with all the time in the states during the 1990s, and before. It needs to never happen again.

Via boxturtlebulletin: LGBT EQUALITY in USA