Soldiers in Afghanistan interpret Lady Gaga in between missions. DADT must be working, clearly this was done without any gay help. Cute enough, though.
(Tipped by JMG reader Ted)
Labels: Afghanistan, Lady Gaga, military, silliness
A personal blog by a graying (mostly Anglo with light African-American roots) gay left leaning liberal progressive married college-educated Buddhist Baha'i BBC/NPR-listening Professor Emeritus now following the Dharma in Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Soldiers in Afghanistan interpret Lady Gaga in between missions. DADT must be working, clearly this was done without any gay help. Cute enough, though.
Labels: Afghanistan, Lady Gaga, military, silliness
"In 2004 the social question that animated the campaign was gay marriage. Before the election season had unfolded, I had talked to George about not making gay marriage a significant issue. We have, I reminded him, a number of close friends who are gay or whose children are gay. But at that moment I could never have imagined what path this issue would take and where it would lead.” - Laura Bush, writing in her forthcoming memoir.
Labels: Dubya, Laura Bush, LGBT rights, marriage equality
a repost via JMGPerry vs. Schwarzenegger Judge Vaughn Walker has set June 16th as the date for the closing arguments. Hilariously, Protect Marriage now wants to suppress the damning testimony of their own witness. Via Prop 8 Trial Tracker:
But besides setting a date for closing arguments, Judge Walker set a date for the defense counsel to submit their motion to suppress at least part of Dr. Tam’s testimony. As you recall, Dr. Tam was the right-wing San Francisco minister who believed that his kids will turn gay if marriage equality was allowed to remain. We’ll find out on May 7th how much of the testimony they want stricken from the record, and what is their basis. Our side will have until May 10th to then file an objection.Although Walker is unlikely to render his verdict in time, I suppose there's a chance of a very big celebration come Pride.
So what happens if Dr. Tam’s testimony is taken out? Dr. Tam was powerful evidence that Prop 8 was driven by animus and a hatred of homosexuals, which would be enough to strike Prop 8 — even under the more lenient “rational basis” grounds set up in Romer v. Evans (1996.) But while Dr. Tam’s testimony is damning and it should be kept in, there was a whole lot of other evidence that our side presented. In fact, when it came time for the defense to produce their “experts,” there wasn’t a whole lot of reason they could provide.
Labels: California, marriage equality, Proposition 8, Protect Marriage
reposted via JMG28 de abril de 2010 | N° 16319Alerta
Um casal homossexual de Bagé obteve ontem no Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ) uma vitória que muda a história do direito de família no Brasil. A psicóloga Luciana Reis Maidana, 36 anos, e a fisioterapeuta Lídia Brignol Guterres, 44 anos, tiveram confirmado o direito de compartilhar a adoção de dois meninos, de seis e sete anos. A decisão, unânime, cria precedente para que outros casais gays adotem filhos em conjunto.
Éa primeira vez que um tribunal superior reconhece o direito. Até agora, os casais homossexuais driblavam a legislação, aproveitando a brecha que permite a solteiros adotar. Adotavam juntos, mas apenas um dos companheiros aparecia nos registros como pai ou mãe. Foi o que aconteceu com as lésbicas de Bagé. Juntas há 13 anos, elas adotaram um menino em 2002 e outro em 2003. Na certidão de nascimento, ambos, hoje com seis e sete anos, apareciam apenas como filhos de Luciana. Com a decisão do STJ, passa a ser oficialmente reconhecido que os meninos têm duas mães.
Os próprios ministros do STJ reconheceram como inovadora a sua decisão. O parecer deles foi de que deve prevalecer o interesse da criança.
– Esse julgamento é muito importante para dar dignidade ao ser humano, para o casal e para as crianças. Se não for dada a adoção, as crianças não terão direito a plano de saúde, herança e em caso de separação ou morte podem ficar desamparadas – disse o relator, Luis Felipe Salomão.
O caso tramitava desde 2005, quando a Vara de Infância e Juventude de Bagé permitiu a Luciana e Lídia o registro dos meninos. O Ministério Público Estadual recorreu. Na época, o promotor da cidade André Barbosa de Borba justificou afirmando que a adoção conjunta só seria permitida em caso de casamento ou união estável. Ele afirmava que, como não havia lei regulamentando a união entre pessoas do mesmo sexo, a adoção seria irregular. Em 2006, Luciana e Lídia obtiveram nova vitória, no Tribunal de Justiça do Estado, que reconheceu a entidade familiar. O MP, porém, voltou a recorrer, o que levou o caso para Brasília.
O ministro Luis Felipe Salomão explicou ontem que o laudo da assistência social recomendou a adoção, assim como parecer do Ministério Público Federal. A expectativa é de que a decisão do STJ abra caminho para uma legislação que reconheça o direito de adoção por homossexuais.
– Não estamos legislando. A lei sempre veio a posteriori – disse o presidente da quarta turma do STJ, ministro João Otávio de Noronha.
Luciane e Lídia não são o único casal homossexual a obter o direito a adoção na Justiça, mas são o primeiro a obter sentença favorável em um tribunal superior. A defensora pública Patrícia Aléssio, que defende Luciane e Lídia desde o início, observa que outros casos não chegaram a Brasília porque, em geral, promotores e procuradores do MP têm concordado com as decisões dos tribunais – o que não ocorreu no caso de Bagé.
Por que é importante |
- Ela cria precedente para pedidos de adoção semelhantes. |
- A lei permite que uma pessoa solteira adote. É por esse caminho que homossexuais podem obter o direito. Mas a criança fica registrada como filha de apenas um dos integrantes do casal. Em caso de morte ou separação do adotante oficial, acaba desamparada. |
- Com a adoção conjunta, a criança não volta a ser considerada órfã em caso de morte do adotante principal. Também tem garantia de direitos como pensão em caso de separação ou herança. |
O RECURSO DO MP |
- O MP argumenta que, pela legislação, pode adotar em conjunto só quem é casado ou vive em união estável. Segundo os promotores, uma união entre duas mulheres não configura entidade familiar. |
O ARGUMENTO DO STJ |
- O ministro Noronha observou que a adoção por um casal gay não é proibida por lei. |
- Segundo ele, nenhum dispositivo legal foi violado, porque o Código Civil não veda a adoção e não há nenhuma norma proibindo a adoção por casais homossexuais. |
Fight Tyranny. Forward This to a Friend
I am opposed to the assault on our Constitution and democracy that Governor Jan Brewer signed into law last week. It is not just an effort to keep Mexicans from entering the United States; it is an attack on the civil rights and liberties of every American.
I stand firmly opposed to this law and fully support its repeal and finding that it is Unconstitutional.
Click Here To Join Our Declaration
According to one summary of the draconian Arizona law, advanced by right wing "Minute Men" and other forces of darkness in our society:
"It requires police officers, 'when practicable,' to detain people they reasonably suspect are in the country without authorization and to verify their status with federal officials, unless doing so would hinder an investigation or emergency medical treatment."
"It also makes it a state crime — a misdemeanor — to not carry immigration papers. In addition, it allows people to sue local government or agencies if they believe federal or state immigration law is not being enforced."
This is both racial profiling and puts me personally at risk for being detained by police officers who might be suspicious of my origins.
I am an American, and I say to the Governor and legislature of Arizona, "Don't Tread on Me."
Click Here To Join Our Declaration
The law also makes it a criminal offense not to have papers showing that you are American.
This is a violation of our civil rights.
I am a proud citizen of the United States.
"Don't Tread on Me" on Arizona.
Click Here To Join Our Declaration
Sincerely,
The Advocacy Team at BuzzFlash
Fight Tyranny. Forward This to a Friend
Sent to orey@csus.edu. Unsubscribe | Update Profile | Forward to a Friend |
Storm clouds! Spinning graphics! Ominous drumbeats! OMFG MAPLE LEAFS!!!
Labels: bigotry, Canada, ENDA, Family Reseach Council, liars, religion, Tony Perkins
a classic repost via JMGBy unanimous vote, the California Assembly has repealed the archaic law requiring research into a "cure" for homosexuality.
Part of a decades-old state law that characterized homosexuality as a sexual deviation that must be cured is no longer on the books. The law was written in 1950 and classifies gay people as sexual deviants. It requires the state to conduct research to find the causes of sex crimes against children and singles out homosexuals as a group that should be researched. The department no longer conducts such research, but the law remained on the books. Assemblywoman Bonnie Lowenthal, D-Long Beach, said the changes make the law read as it should have 60 years ago. She said California is now "setting things right."The bill now goes to the state Senate. "Ex-gay" lunatics PFOX continue to oppose the repeal.
Labels: California, homosexuality, PFOX
a repost via JMGBette Jo and Jo Ann became friends as college students in 1960. They reconnected 20 years later in Massachusetts, and fell in love. After 23 years as a couple, they were legally married on June 7, 2004 in the garden of their Jamaica Plain home.
Bette Jo, 68, retired last year after a 35-year career as a labor and delivery nurse. Jo Ann, also 68, still works part-time as a garden educator. But both are deeply involved in supporting their community full-time.
jump here to read the full story
On the 20th anniversary of Ryan White's death from AIDS, Elton John has written Ryan a letter. From the Washington Post, an excerpt:
Ryan, I wish you could know how much the world has changed since 1990, and how much you changed it. Young boys and girls with HIV attend school and take medicine that allows them to lead normal lives. Children in America are seldom born with the virus, and they no longer contract it through transfusions. The insults and injustices you suffered are not tolerated by society.
Most important, Ryan, you inspired awareness, which helped lead to lifesaving treatments. In 1990, four months after you died, Congress passed the Ryan White Care Act, which now provides more than $2 billion each year for AIDS medicine and treatment for half a million Americans. Today, countless people with HIV live long, productive lives. It breaks my heart that you are not one of them. You were 18 when you died, and you would be 38 this year, if only the current treatments existed when you were sick. I think about this every day, because America needs your message of compassion as never before.
Labels: Elton John, good work, HIV/AIDS, Ryan White
GetEQUAL sends us the above grid detailing the known (and unknown) DADT positions of Senators that serve on the Armed Services Committee. GetEQUAL: "These are very important targets to go after in the next 30 days with non-violent direct action and civil disobedience. It is of utmost importance that you contact ALL these Senators and express the importance of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell." They suggest using these talking points when calling the above Senators.
Labels: activism, DADT, GetEQUAL, Senate
reposted from JMGAurelia Frick, Minister of Justice of Liechtenstein, had promised that by summer 2010, the Principality will give itself a law that recognizes same-sex couples. Now the Government submitted the bill to Parliament which is expected to be treated de facto unions to heterosexual marriages as regards inheritance, social security, retirement pensions, immigration and naturalization, and other tax matters. Remain outside the law and adoptions that access to artificial insemination.
I am not certain whether this is a civil marriage bill, allowable on the same terms as heterosexual marriage, or if it is just the granting of limited rights to de facto couples.
Over the last seven days...
Labels: religion, This Week In Holy Crimes
Here's another story about how restrictions on free speech ultimately get used to quell political debate and silence certain opinions, no matter what the intentions were in developing those restrictions.
I was following a story from Toronto last month on Page1Q (didn't post about it here, though) about how the Toronto Pride committee set up a panel to pre-approve signs people wanted to march with in pride this year.
In a press release, Pride Toronto co-chair Jim Cullen wrote that all messages must "support the theme of the 2010 festival, celebrating '30 Years of Pride in Toronto.'"
People immediately thought the new policy was meant to keep Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (QuAIA) out of the parade, although some people thought it was about homocons as well (they're always the victim). A Facebook group called "Don't Sanitize Pride" was created and thousands joined. The Pride committee's spokesperson refused to say why the policy was put in place.
Continue reading "Pride is about making people uncomfortable" »
Waymon pointed me to another Christian music singer who's gay, former American Idol contestant R.J. Helton. He came out in 2006 after his first Christian album and his run on Idol. Here's his performance of "Blessing," a song about a Christian coming out to his parents. It's a little Idoly for me, but I'm not the target audience.
A video of him from Idol after the jump.