Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Via FB


 

Your Vote Matters: Vote Wisely

Your Vote Matters: Vote Wisely

By Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi

 

Dear Dharma friends,

There is a widespread belief among Buddhists that a good Buddhist practitioner should remain indifferent to politics, and so, when election time comes around, too many Buddhists decide to sit out the vote. To vote, they think, is to take sides, and a “real Buddhist” remains “neutral,” utterly detached from mundane concerns.


Such a belief involves a wrong grasp of the Dharma. While it is true that politics can be toxic, it becomes toxic when emotions about candidates and issues lead to irrational decisions and disruptive actions. It is not politics that is at fault, but the way people engage with politics. For all its pitfalls, politics is a vital sphere of human activity where critical moral contests are waged. It is the concrete expression of our communal and national lives, and Buddhist values should play a crucial role in guiding our decisions about voting.


In a democracy, voting is both an act of civic responsibility and an expression of our moral convictions. In our secular age, we might even call voting “a sacred act.” Thousands of people in countries around the world, including the U.S., have sacrificed their lives to win the right to vote. In many countries today, where voting is either non-existent or an empty charade, oppressed citizens struggle to gain this precious right and to make their vote represent their genuine will.


Let’s not forget that here in the U.S. it was through political action that slavery was abolished, that child labor was prohibited, that women and minorities secured the right to vote. It was voting that ensured environmental pollution was reduced and basic social protections and services were provided. Benefits we now take for granted, like public schools, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, were not handed to us by our politicians on a silver platter. Rather, we had to win them by protests and petitions—and by voting for candidates who would enact them. If we are negligent, we may easily lose these benefits.


It was also through elections that the U.S. has abandoned its global responsibilities, cut off assistance to desperate communities around the world, withdrawn from global climate commitments, sent ICE agents into the streets of our cities to catch, detain, and deport vulnerable people, and launched aggressive wars that have killed thousands and upset the world’s economies. Our decisions matter; our votes really make a difference to our own lives and the lives of people all around the world.  


Voting is our voice, the way we silently say what we think is right. It’s an act by which, as mere individuals, we take responsibility for the whole. With our vote we speak on behalf of the entire nation, we speak for future generations, and indeed—given the momentous role that the U.S. plays on the world stage—for the future destiny of humankind. We can’t abandon this responsibility from some imagined ideal of saintly detachment. To do so would be to shirk our moral duty.


In just two weeks, on November 3, the U.S. will hold an extremely important election. The results of this election will have an impact on the lives of everyone in this country and are likely to reverberate across the planet for decades to come. The election is just too critical for anyone with a sense of humane responsibility to sit out. If we truly esteem the values of good will, loving-kindness, and compassion, we must express these ideals in the simple act of voting.


Though the actual Election Day falls on Tuesday, November 3, many states offer the chance to vote early and to vote by a mail-in ballot. Rules governing the voting process differ from state to state. To find out how, when, and where to vote, you can go here. Make sure you accept only accurate information coming from reliable sources, not the kind of disinformation floating around on malicious websites and mischievous Facebook pages.


In this year’s election all seats in the House of Representatives are open to the vote, and 35 seats in the Senate are at play. There will also be contests for state and local positions. While these may seem minor compared to congressional elections, we should give them our attention too.


For whom should one vote? While BGR does not endorse any candidates, bringing the right people into office is deeply relevant to BGR’s mission. The team at BGR looks upon compassion, justice, and solidarity with others as our fundamental values. We affirm the intrinsic dignity of every person as the inspiration behind our work. We regard these values not merely as abstract ideals but as guides to action, and the policies adopted by our elected representatives have a potent impact on our ability to transform those values into action. These policies determine whether hungry people will receive food, whether children in remote regions will get to attend school, whether sick people will have access to medical care, whether our organization will have the resources to provide assistance to the most needy.


Though formulated centuries ago, the Buddha’s teachings offer clear principles that may help us make the right decision when we enter the polling booth. A useful text in this regard is the Kalama Sutta. In this teaching, when the Kalamas ask the Buddha what spiritual path they should follow, he does not tell them to follow his own path. Rather, he tells them to put aside their biases, emotional preferences, and uncritical beliefs, and instead carefully consider whether a teaching encourages greed, violence, avarice, and lying, or instead promotes such values as non-injury, generosity, honesty, and truthfulness.


With this teaching as our polestar we can evaluate the candidates running for office and investigate their personal qualities. We shouldn’t be misled by their charm, oratory skills, wealth, and fame. Instead, we should look into their moral integrity and carefully consider their proposals. We should take into account not only whether their proposals will benefit us personally, but whether their ideas spring from a wide sympathetic outlook that addresses the major problems our country faces and the challenges facing the global community today.


Don’t expect any candidate to be perfect. Don’t expect any policy proposal to be perfect. Virtually any candidate is bound to have personal flaws. Any proposed policy or piece of legislation is bound to have shortcomings. Instead, we should compare the alternatives and then determine which candidate seems most likely to contribute to peace and shared prosperity, to uphold democratic norms of governance, and to unify and inspire the country around worthy ideals rather than incite violence and division for the sake of enhancing their personal power and wealth.


Once you make your decisions, don’t just sit quietly at home. Go out to vote, and also encourage your eligible family members, friends, and neighbors to vote. And remember: Before you can vote, you have to register to vote. To find out how to register online, simply and efficiently, you can go here.

 


With metta,

Ven. Bhikkhu Bodhi

Chairperson, BGR

Via LGBTq Nation \\ In our declining democracy, teaching LGBTQ+ topics in schools is more important than ever It’s easy to overlook the benefits of LGBTQ+-inclusive education, but learning is incomplete without it.


 

Via Daily Dharma: You Are a Fool

 

 
You Are a Fool
If you cannot have a sense of humor about what a fool you are, then you are misusing your mind in such a way that it produces suffering.

Yoshin David Radin, “The True Path”
​

Via Dhamma Wheel | Right Speech: Refraining from Frivolous Speech

 


Via AI Overview \\ Gate Gate Paragate Parasamgate Bodhi Svaha

 AI Overview

The mantra “Gate Gate Paragate Parasamgate Bodhi Svaha” is the closing phrase of the famous Mahayana Buddhist text, the Heart Sutra (Prajñaparamita Hridaya). It translates loosely to: "Gone, gone, gone beyond, gone completely beyond, awakening, hail!" [1, 2, 3, 4]

Word-by-Word Translation
  • Gate (गते): Gone
  • Gate (गते): Gone (repeated for emphasis)
  • Paragate (परगते): Gone to the further shore
  • Parasamgate (परसंगते): Completely gone to the further shore (using the intensive prefix sam)
  • Bodhi (बोधि): Awakening, enlightenment, or the awakened mind
  • Svaha (स्वाहा): A traditional Vedic sacrificial exclamation, often compared to "amen" or "hail" to seal the mantra [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Via Yogapedia \\ What Does Gate Gate Para Gate Para Sam Gate Bodhi Swaha Mean?


 

Monday, October 19, 2026

Via Daily Dharma: Notice What’s Here

 

 
Notice What’s Here
The goal is not to escape everyday problems, situations, or issues that need to be dealt with. Instead, experience what it’s like to step out of the problem-solver identity: Relax this manager and notice what’s here.

Loch Kelly, “Glimpsing Mindfulness”
​

Via Dhamma Wheel | Right Intention: Cultivating Equanimity

 


Saturday, October 17, 2026

Via Daily Dharma: Dissolving Ego

 

 
Dissolving Ego
The realization that the egoic system will eventually dissolve if we don’t add more thought or energy to it is a wonderful one when first experienced, and a real taste of the potential freedom to come if we continue with practice.

Teah Strozer, “RAIN”
​

Via Dhamma Wheel | Right Mindfulness and Concentration: Establishing Mindfulness of Mind and Abiding in the Third Jhāna


 

Via Tricycle: The Buddhist Review \\ From the Academy: Mahayana’s Origins

THE BUDDHIST REVIEW
From the Academy
October 2026
From the Academy is a monthly newsletter for Premium subscribers, developed in collaboration with Tricycle’s resident Ho Family Foundation Buddhism Public Scholar. Each issue highlights a scholarly take on a key topic in Buddhist thought and practice, with further readings and videos for exploration.

Mahayana’s Origins

Asked what he considered the most pressing issues in Buddhist studies, Donald S. Lopez Jr. ​replied with four: the date of the Buddha’s death, the rise of the Mahayana, the origins of Buddhist tantra, and the disappearance of Buddhism in India. He gave a disclaimer that he could settle none. Scholars have been working on these questions for nearly two centuries.
​
The rise of the Mahayana is the most conspicuous of these gaps. Mahayana Buddhists produced most of what the West recognizes as Buddhism, carrying it into East Asia and Tibet. Yet no one can say where it started, when, or with whom.

Head of a bodhisattva, Gandhara, c. 4th century CE. A bodhisattva vows to become a buddha in order to liberate all beings, an aspiration that became central to the Mahayana. | Asian Civilisations Museum / Wikimedia Commons

Dating the Sutras
 
Based on the earliest surviving Chinese translations, scholars tentatively dated the emergence of the Mahayana to the beginning of the 1st century CE. However, a birch-bark scroll from ancient Gandhara, a perfection of wisdom sutra radiocarbon-dated to around 75 CE, is now the oldest Mahayana manuscript we have, and it’s a copy of an earlier text. That pushed dating back further, possibly into the 1st century BCE, but manuscripts still cannot tell us when a text was composed or whether its authors saw themselves as a distinct school.
​
Mahayana scriptures resist dating in other ways. No sutra carries an author’s name. Multiple versions survive with no identifiable original, so there is no fixed point from which to date the rest. Scholars have often dated sutras early because their content matches what they expect of early Mahayana, then cite this as evidence for that expectation.
Reading the Ruins
 
Archaeology yields firmer dates, but not ones that answer the question of origins. A donative inscription from near Mathura, India, records the earliest known image of Amitabha, a prominent Mahayana buddha, dated to the 2nd century CE. A stone inscription from Endere, along the ancient Silk Road, carries the earliest epigraphic use of the term mahayana. That one dates to the 3rd century.
​
Neither tells us much. The Mathura pedestal proves someone commissioned an image of Amitabha, not what they called their tradition. The Endere inscription supplies the word, but from Central Asia, long after the earliest sutras circulated. Inscriptions almost never identify donors as Mahayana until the 5th century. Whatever the Mahayana was in its early centuries, it left very little in the archaeological record.

Inscribed pedestal of Amitabha, dated to the 2nd century CE. | Government Museum, Mathura / Wikimedia Commons

Who Started It?
 
Scholars initially proposed stupa cults, lay practitioners, and forest ascetics as the first promoters of the Mahayana. Most now trace its beginnings to monastic communities. The Mahayana was never a sect or institutional movement, and had no ordination lineage. It was a claim about who its followers already were: advanced bodhisattvas who had spent countless lives on the path. Those who accepted these teachings originally shared quarters, teachers, and alms with monks who did not.
​
That friendly association did not seem to last. Later scriptures emphasized that the Mahayana, meaning the “great vehicle,” was vastly superior to other paths. The claim drew objections. The dharmabhanakas, or teachers of the Mahayana, who recited these works were sometimes criticized or rejected. Indian Mahayana authors spent nearly a thousand years defending their sutras as the word of the Buddha, which tells us many denied it.

Building a Genealogy
 
The Mahayana sutras open as all Buddhist scriptures do, with a disciple reporting what he heard the Buddha say. Many place teachings composed centuries later in the Buddha’s mouth at Vulture Peak, a common setting for many sutras. For Mahayana Buddhists, part of constructing a meaningful genealogy was to look back to the tradition’s earliest days, and to see their own teachings as commensurate with those of the Buddha himself.

Additional Material

Follow Us
facebook
instagram
x_twitter
youtube
tiktok
Custom
custom
custom
 
Copyright © 2026 Tricycle Foundation
All rights reserved.
89 5th Ave New York, NY 10003