Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
A personal blog by a graying (mostly Anglo with light African-American roots) gay left leaning liberal progressive married college-educated Buddhist Baha'i BBC/NPR-listening Professor Emeritus now following the Dharma in Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma / FB:
Tricycle Daily Dharma June 11, 2013
A New Approach
What
disintegrates in periods of rapid transformation is not the self, but
its defenses and assumptions. Self-protection restricts vision and
movement like a suit of armor, making it harder to adapt. Going to
pieces, however uncomfortable, can open us up to new perceptions, new
data, and new responses.
|
- Joanna Macy, "The Greatest Danger"
Monday, June 10, 2013
Via JMG: Google Salutes Maurice Sendak
Today's Google Doogle pays tribute to gay author Maurice Sendak, who died last year. Sendak came out in 2008 at the age of 80 and revealed a 50-year relationship with his partner.
For what would have been his 85th birthday on Monday, Google has drawn up a wonderfully imagined Google Doodle as a tribute to the beloved illustrator and children’s book author Maurice Sendak. It begins, of course, with Max sailing to the land of Where the Wild Things Are, but soon also ventures to the surreal cityscape of In The Night Kitchen and ends, appropriately, with the birthday party from Sendak's 2011 book Bumble-Ardy. Happy birthday, Mr. Sendak.
Reposted from Joe
Via JMG: No Marriage Rulings From SCOTUS Today
The Supreme Court has released its regular Monday rulings and the same-sex marriage cases do not appear on the list.
Most do not expect the DOMA and Prop 8 rulings to be issued until the
end of the month, but there is a chance they could come sooner. There
will be another round of rulings issued later this week in a rare
Thursday release.
Reposted from Joe
Via JMG: Californians Back Marriage By 22 Points
The Los Angeles Times reports on their latest poll:
The poll found that 58% of the state's registered voters believe same-sex marriage should be legal, compared with 36% against, a margin of 22 points. When the same pollsters asked that question three years ago, 52% favored gay marriage and 40% opposed it, a 12-point spread.If Prop 8 is upheld and marriage ends up returning to the ballot in California, at least we have this as a starting point. For now.
Most national polls this year have found majority support, but only one of those surveys reported it as high as 58%. The average was roughly 51% in favor of gay marriage. As in the rest of the country, more women (63%) than men (52%) in California favor same-sex marriage.
Younger California voters also support gay marriage by larger margins than older voters, the poll found. Whereas 76% of voters ages 18 to 29 support legalizing the unions, only 52% of those ages 50 to 64 agree.
Still, the shifts among older voters are dramatic. Voters 65 and older are now almost evenly divided — 46% in favor, 47% against — compared with just three years ago, when seniors opposed gay marriage by 19 percentage points.
Labels: California, marriage equality, polls, Prop 8
Via The Buddha's Face / FB:
To allow oneself to be carried away by a multitude of conflicting concerns, to surrender to too many demands, to commit to too many projects, to want to help everyone in everything is itself to succumb to the violence of our times. Frenzy destroys our inner capacity for peace. It destroys the fruitfulness of our work, because it kills the root of inner wisdom which makes work fruitful.
~Thomas Merton
Via Today.com: How Gay Married Couples get Shortchanged
How gay married couples get shortchanged
June 9, 2013 at 10:32 AM ET
Jason DeCrow / AP
"Few of those benefits are more important than Social Security," says Crosby Burns, policy analyst of the LGBT Research and Communications Project at the Center for American Progress, an independent, nonpartisan educational institute based in Washington, D.C.
"This program forms part of the bedrock of our nation's safety net," Burns says. "With full and equal access to this social insurance program, families headed by same-sex couples would finally have access to the economic safeguards they need, intended to keep them out of poverty and afloat during hard times."
Chief among them, Henry says, are the spousal benefit, the spousal disability benefit, the lump-sum benefit and the survivors benefit. The children of same-sex parents would also be affected.
Read on to see how the Social Security system works in favor of heterosexual married couples and against same-sex married couples. If DOMA is struck down, gay couples stand to gain more Social Security benefits.
Make the jump here to read the full article courtesy of today.com
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma
Tricycle Daily Dharma June 10, 2013
Here and Now
Heaven
and hell are not some places I’m going to go to later on. Heaven and
hell are here right now, and I create them for myself with my own
choices.
|
- Hae Doh Gary Schwocho, "Beneath Belief"
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma June 9, 2013
Nowhere to Stay
Pleasure
isn’t a place for you to stay. Pain isn’t a place for you to stay. Pain
wears away. Pleasure wears away. Our foremost Teacher said that all
fabrications are inconstant.
|
- Ajahn Chah, “The Last Gift”
Friday, June 7, 2013
Via JMG:POLL: Parents Chill About Gay Kids
More from Pew's latest study:
Reposted from Joe
In 1985, a Los Angeles Times survey found that 64% of the public said they would be “very upset” if their child told them he or she was gay or lesbian. By 2004, that number had fallen by almost half (33%). Since then, it has declined another 14 points, to 19%. Instead, a majority (55%) now says they would not be upset if they learned their child was gay or lesbian, a 19-point increase since 2004 and a 46-point increase since the mid-1980s. Again, this has been an across-the-board shift in attitudes.
Yet the change has been more dramatic among some groups than others. In 2004, fully 82% of those 65 and older said they would be upset if their child told them they were gay, and 50% said they’d be very upset. Today, only about half (47%) say they’d be upset and just 24% say they’d be very upset.Among Republicans, the percentage saying they’d be very upset if they learned their child was gay or lesbian also has fallen by half – from 44% to 22% – since 2004.
Labels: homosexuality, parenting, polls
Thursday, June 6, 2013
Via JMG: GERMANY: High Court Rules That Gay Couples Deserve Equal Tax Benefits
In what is being characterized as a setback to the administration of Chancellor Angela Merkel, Germany's highest court has ruled that same-sex couples are entitled to the same tax benefits granted to married straight couples.
The verdict requires a change in the law and is a red rag to some in Merkel's Christian Democrats (CDU) and its traditionally Catholic Bavarian sister party, the Christian Social Union (CSU), who worry that conservative values are being diluted. The ruling was widely expected after the court in February overturned a ban on same-sex couples adopting a child already adopted by one of the partners. "The provisions set out in the income-tax law violate the general rule of equality," wrote the Karlsruhe-based court, adding the law should be changed retroactively from August 2001. Same-sex partnerships have been legal in Germany since 2001 but do not enjoy the same tax benefits as married heterosexuals.Openly gay Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle hailed the ruling, saying that the time has come "for German tax law to be as modern as its society." A spokesman for the Christian Social Union party denounced the news as an attack on the "sanctity of marriage." (Tipped by JMG reader Matthew)
Labels: Angela Merkel, Germany, LGBT rights
Via JMG: Another Positive Marriage Poll
You'll have to embiggen the above image to see the details, but here's the gist of the latest Bloomberg Poll:
Reposted from Joe
More than half of Americans support allowing same-sex couples to marry, endorsing the goal of gay-rights activists as the U.S. Supreme Court this month prepares to rule on the issue for the first time. Fifty-two percent say they back giving gay couples the right to marry, compared with 41 percent who are opposed, according to a Bloomberg National Poll conducted May 31-June 3. Of those supporters, more than half -- 61 percent -- want a national law rather than a state-by-state approach. During arguments in March, the justices signaled a reluctance to declare a right to same-sex marriage nationwide.
Labels: marriage equality, polls, SCOTUS
Via JMG: POLL: Majority Of Same-Sex Marriage Opponents Say Legalization Is Inevitable
Jeremy Hooper writes at NOM Exposed:
This is what NOM is up against: a reality where even a majority of its own supporters know that marriage equality is going to happen, despite their driven efforts. This obvious inevitability is, far and away, the most damaging thing NOM faces—which is precisely why they are working so hard to deny it. They know that the writing on the wall demoralizes their support base and depresses their donations, so they are acting as if it's all a lie. They pretend the trajectory and polling is just something we've concocted rather than an accurate representation of where America stands. This Pew Poll shows them to be wrong. More importantly, it shows that even a majority of their own supporters know it.
Labels: marriage equality, NOM, polls
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma June 5, 2013
Not Judging our Emotions
There
isn’t any such thing as a negative emotion. There are negative things
that we do with our emotions, but our emotions themselves are neither
negative nor positive.
|
- Robert Augustus Masters, "From Spiritual Bypassing"
Tuesday, June 4, 2013
Via JMG: Quote Of The Day - Rep. Earl Blumenauer
"Let's get real and stop the charade about what a 'social welfare' organization is. Last year, internal National Organization for Marriage (NOM) strategy documents were leaked, stating that the organization seeks 'to drive a wedge between gays and blacks' by promoting "African American spokespeople for marriage,' thus provoking same-sex marriage supporters into 'denouncing these spokesmen and women as bigots,' and "to interrupt the assimilation" of Latinos into 'dominant Anglo culture' by making the stance against same-sex marriage 'a key badge of Latino identity.'
"Does this sound like social welfare to you? Social welfare organizations should work in the public interest -- not to divide, exploit, and conquer. When I brought this up at the hearing today, Dr. Eastman, Chairman of the Board of NOM, angrily groused, 'To say that defending traditional marriage doesn't qualify for defense of the public good is beyond preposterous.'
"To Dr. Eastman, I say that it is the denial of my constituents, and all Americans, the right to marry the person they love is preposterous. To exploit racial and religious differences so you can fundraise for and enforce your specific worldview is preposterous. But your right to be preposterous should not extend to taking political positions under the guise of a social welfare organization, raising money and campaigning." - Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR), writing for the Huffington Post.
Labels: bigotry, Catholic Church, Congress, Earl Blumenauer, FTW, hate groups, John Eastman, NOM, racism, religion, Vatican
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)