Via AmericaBlogGay: Did Obama nudge history, or did history nudge him?

From Greg Sargent:

The White House response is to plead for maneuvering room by arguing that Obama has played an important role in nudging history in the right direction on the issue. Whether this will be enough remains to be seen. It’s hard to imagine gays deserting him in significant numbers, though enthusiasm and fundraising could suffer. But it seems clear that the White House has settled on its approach to this problem.

I don't think the President has nudged history at all. Like most Democrats, he's far behind both history and the American public on our issues (Joe calls this "political homophobia"). The public was consistently at 70% to 80% in the polls with regards to repealing DADT, they have the same views on ENDA, and recent polls are finally showing a majority in favor of marriage equality.

Why is it then that we had to beat the bejeesus out of the President to get him to finally move on DADT, and to get him to simply stop defending DOMA (something he did far too late, giving the Republicans the chance to now defend it instead)?  He didn't bend the arc of history, we did.  The President, and the party, are far behind the arc of history when it comes to our civil rights.  And rather than attempting to bend it in the right direction, they seem to be doing all they can to run from it as fast as they can, while offering us a tantalizing platter of b-rate advances that should have all been done on the first day of the new administration.

Yes, the President has done some good things.  (Though much of it is standard stuff that doesn't really count as fierce advocacy (such as appointing a gay ambassador after Clinton and Bush already both did the same), or issuing a Pride proclamation and holding a cocktail party that routinely black lists any gay Democratic leader who has stood up to the President.)  But the good the President's done on our top three issues - DADT and DOMA repeal, and the passage of ENDA - has so far been marginal at best.

Once DADT is fully repealed - and sadly the administration is dragging its feet on that now too, while many of us fear a delay will only embolden the GOP to try to some legislative funny business in the fall - that will be a true feather in the President's cap.  But let's not forget that Barack Obama had the opportunity to do so much more, on gay rights, on health care reform, on the stimulus, on eliminating tax cuts, on the budget, on immigration, on civil liberties, and he didn't.  And the only reason he did as much as he did on gay rights, even though it wasn't enough, is because a great many of us in the Netroots took the arc of history and threw it in his face.

Via AmericaBlogGay: Amazing words on DADT repeal from top enlisted Marine

The article is short, rather than try to excerpt it, just go over. It's great.

Via AmericaBlogGay: Kerry Eleveld: What Will Obama Tell The Gays Under The Shadow Of Lady Liberty?

The pressure is building for Obama to Evolve Already.

Read all of Kerry's post. As usual, I can't really add much to Kerry's words:

Look, everyone knows this is a political calculation. President Obama was for marriage equality as a state senator in 1996 before he was against it as an aspiring presidential candidate in 2004 (the evolution of his positions are traced here). But as he heads into the 2012 election cycle, it’s becoming increasingly difficult for him to have it both ways on same-sex marriage – to carry the magic mantle of hope and change, to appeal to the better angels of our nature, while literally falling behind the trend lines on supporting something as fundamentally American as the expression of our liberty.

Here’s just a few notes on the shift in dynamics since the ‘08 election: Obama doesn’t have the cover of two competing Democratic candidates who also hold the same position of not supporting marriage equality; when he took office, only one state had legalized marriage and now five have plus the District of Columbia; a federal judge has ruled the crux of the Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional and Obama himself has concurred; another federal judge ruled a California ballot measure stripping marital rights from gays unconstitutional; five major consecutive polls, including Gallup, have now found that a majority of Americans support the right of same-sex couples to marry; “don’t ask, don’t tell” has been repealed (but not lifted yet) and although GOP lawmakers are still waging the battles of yesteryear in Congress, the rest of America barely batted an eye.

Beyond a shadow of a doubt, all this adds up to one thing: Drama. But more importantly, it’s about people’s lives, who they are to the core of their being, the fact that their heart pounds just as truly as everyone else’s. It’s about a longing for leadership that adds up to something more than a cold political calculation for the next election cycle.

But if calculate we must, let’s face it, the next election – like every election – will be about the economy, not marriage equality. So why not come full circle and stake your claim on the right side of history, Mr. President?

Do UOL Notícias: Corregedora do TJ cassa decisão de juiz que anulou união homoafetiva em Goiás

• Mesmo com decisão do STF, casal gay teve união estável cancelada em Goiás
  

A corregedora do Tribunal de Justiça de Goiás (TJ-GO), desembargadora Beatriz Figueiredo Franco, cassou decisão do juiz goiano que anulou a união estável de um casal homossexual e proibiu os cartórios do Estado de emitir outros contratos de união estável. O caso será levado para a Corte Especial do tribunal, que irá decidir se instaura um processo disciplinar contra o juiz.

O juiz Jerônymo Pedro Villas Boas, da 1ª Vara da Fazenda Pública Municipal e de Registros Públicos de Goiânia, anulou, na última sexta-feira (17), a união estável de um casal mesmo depois de o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) equiparar os direitos dos gays aos dos casais heterossexuais. Com isso, os homossexuais passaram a poder firmar contratos de união estável em cartórios de todo país.

Na decisão, o juiz de Goiás contestou o Supremo, e disse que a Corte não tem competência para alterar normas da Constituição Federal. O artigo 226 traz em seu texto que, “para efeito da proteção do Estado, é reconhecida a união estável entre o homem e a mulher como entidade familiar, devendo a lei facilitar sua conversão”. Esta seria a norma que o juiz entendeu inviolável. Villas Boas afirmou a Folha.com que a decisão do STF "ultrapassou os limites" e é "ilegítima e inconstitucional".

No domingo, o presidente em exercício da OAB nacional, Miguel Cançado, divulgou nota afirmando ser “um retrocesso moralista” a decisão do juiz. Segundo Cançado, ao decidir sobre a união estável, o STF exerceu o papel de guardião e intérprete da Constituição. “As relações homoafetivas compõem uma realidade social que merecem a proteção legal”, afirmou.

Na segunda-feira, o ministro do STF Luiz Fux afirmou que a decisão poderia ser considerada "um atentado" passível de revisão.

para ler mais

Via Acapa: Casamento gay anulado volta a ter validade em Goiás

Por Redação em 21/06/2011 às 20h06

 

O juiz da 1ª Vara de Fazenda Pública de Goiânia, Jeronymo Pedro Villa Boas, que anulou o contrato de união estável entre Leo Mendes (foto, à esq.) e Odílio Torres, teve sua decisão revogada pela desembargadora Beatriz Figueiredo, do Tribunal de Justiça de Goiás.

Na época, o juiz alegou que o Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) teria "alterado" a Constituição ao reconhecer as uniões entre pessoas do mesmo sexo. Villas Boas determinou então que os cartórios da cidade não deveriam registrar uniões estáveis entre homossexuais. Depois que o STF reconheceu a união gay como entidade familiar, o casal Leo Mendes e Odílio Torres foram os primeiros a oficializar a união estável.

Mesmo com a validação da desembargadora Beatriz Figueiredo, Leo Mendes e Odílio Torres decidiram ir até o Rio de Janeiro, onde irão oficializar novamente sua união estável.

Via Bilerico: How Obama's 'Evolution' on Marriage May Help Us

Have we stopped to consider how Obama's "evolution" on marriage has benefitted us in media and public consciousness? By having this process of "evolving" on marriage, the media has kept a spotlight on the marriage debate in a way they likely would not have if he'd just kept his mouth shut or if he'd just come out in support of marriage and been done.

We know that most people don't sit around every day thinking about same-sex marriage or any other LGBT issues. With Obama's position on marriage still up in the air, every time something on the ground changes, you can be sure a question about the President's position on marriage equality will come up in a White House press briefing. This gives the people who are sitting on the fence the space to think, as well as someone they can relate to in the process - the President of the United States, no less. This is not a small thing.

Make the jump her to continue reading

Repassando: Homofobia na escola cresce 160% em SP

Estudo baseado no ENEM diz que há um aumento 160% da homofobia nas escolas. Paraná  e  segundo  estado  mais  Homofóbico. Toni Reis Toni Reis O ESTADO DE S. PAULO - SP | VIDA LGBT 19/06/2011 Homofobia na escola cresce 160% em SP Estudo feito com base em questionário do Enem, de 2004 a 2008, expõe discriminação  Isis Brum - O Estado de S.Paulo É mais com raiva que saudade que o tradutor e editor de livros Alexandre Camarú, de 41 anos, lembra do ensino médio. Naquele período, foi perseguido e humilhado por colegas de sala e professores por ser gay. Foram tempos difíceis no ambiente escolar, de exclusão e angústia, que o tempo não ajudou a reduzir - não para os adolescentes homossexuais.  Um levantamento inédito, feito com base no questionário socioeconômico do Exame Nacional do Ensino Médio (Enem), entre 2004 e 2008, mostra um crescimento de 160% no número de pessoas que se declararam vítimas de homofobia no Estado de São Paulo.  O índice é superior à média do País, cujo aumento foi de 150%, e coloca o Estado na lista dos cinco mais homofóbicos do Brasil - atrás de Santa Catarina (211%), Paraná (175%), Rio Grande do Norte (162,5%) e Alagoas (164,7%).  Em 2004, 1,5% dos estudantes paulistas afirmou ter sofrido preconceito por causa de sua orientação sexual. Quatro anos depois, o porcentual passou para 3,9%. Foram analisadas as respostas de 6,4 milhões de estudantes concluintes do ensino médio, com idades entre 16 e 25 anos, que prestaram o Enem entre 2004 e 2008. Após esse ano, as questões relativas à homofobia foram retiradas dos questionários.  Mais denúncias. Para especialistas em diversidade sexual, o aumento da homofobia está relacionado à maior consciência da discriminação por parte das vítimas - o que faz aumentar as denúncias.  Outra hipótese relaciona o crescimento da discriminação ao maior número de adolescentes que assumem a sua homossexualidade desde cedo.  "Esse é um problema de influência de vários níveis, de como a escola se organiza e da cultura", afirma Josafá Cunha, da Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste (Unicentro), um dos pesquisadores. "A reação dos nossos colegas nos ajuda a saber que comportamentos estão corretos e quais não são tolerados pela sociedade. As crianças adotam esses valores como reflexo da cultura e os replicam na escola", continua.  O problema é que a discriminação e a violência causada pela intolerância à diversidade sexual fazem da escola um ambiente muito menos acolhedor. Em uma escala de zero a dez pontos, a percepção da qualidade do ensino foi, em média, meio ponto maior entre os que não relataram perseguição homofóbica.  Vítimas relatam anos de sofrimento Isis Brum - O Estado de S.Paulo  Ainda criança, quando nem sabia o que eram sexualidade e desejo, Alexandre Camarú, de 41 anos, sentia atração pelos meninos e não entendia, ao mesmo tempo, por que era "tão diferente" deles.  Os anos da pré-adolescência não foram "idílicos", mas não chegaram a ser sofríveis como os dois primeiros anos do ensino médio, em uma escola particular da capital paulista, onde estudou com bolsa.  "Os meninos da sala eram homofóbicos. E dois deles, especialmente, eram piores. Mas tinha ao menos um professor que fazia piada sobre mim na sala de aula", conta o tradutor e editor. Dois colegas furtaram seus passes e documentos. Foi o único alvo da sala durante o intervalo. Foi a gota d"água para pedir transferência para uma instituição da rede estadual. "Mas o pior preconceito que enfrentei foi com o meu pai. Faz 20 anos que não nos falamos. Ele simplesmente me excluiu da família", conta.  O editor de vídeos D.M.A., de 24 anos, também era vítima das piadas dos colegas de escola. "Eu queria ser como eles e tentava ser igual, para conviver com os outros garotos", relembra D, que pediu para ter sua identidade preservada. "Mas era totalmente excluído e não entendia o porquê", afirma.  Depois de passar alguns anos sofrendo calado as humilhações por causa de sua orientação sexual, D. se rebelou. Assumiu-se HOMOSSEXUAL e passou a se defender das agressões verbais com a mesma intensidade com que as recebia.  As recordações dos tempos de colégio, para ele, também não são das melhores. "Olho para trás e não sinto falta de nada. Vejo o D. de antes e sinto pena daquele garoto inocente e indefeso", conclui. "As escolas precisam ensinar o valor das pessoas não por serem gays ou lésbicas, mas como humanos, simplesmente", defende Josafá Cunha, professor do Departamento de Psicologia da Unicentro.  Capacitação. Para Araci Asinelli, professora de pós-graduação em Educação na Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), "a escola e os professores têm um papel preponderante na formação da personalidade". Por isso, "é preciso olhar para os professores e capacitá-los", diz.  "As escolas devem ensinar que a única diferença entre homos e heterossexuais é a orientação do desejo", afirma Sandra Vasques, psicóloga e coordenadora de projetos do Instituto Kaplan, especializado em sexualidade humana.

Via JMG: NOM's League Of Bigots

You must click over to Good As You for Jeremy Hooper's excellent bigot-by-bigot breakdown of the fuckweasels in this photograph and all the repulsive, horrible, lying bullshit they've said about LGBT people.

Labels: assholery, bigotry, hate groups, Jeremy Hooper, NOM, religion

reposted from Joe

Via JMG: From The Top Enlisted Marine

"Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution is pretty simple. It says, 'Raise an army.' It says absolutely nothing about race, color, creed, sexual orientation. You all joined for a reason: to serve. To protect our nation, right? How dare we, then, exclude a group of people who want to do the same thing you do right now, something that is honorable and noble? Right? Get over it. We’re magnificent, we’re going to continue to be. Let’s just move on, treat everybody with firmness, fairness, dignity, compassion and respect. Let’s be Marines." - Command Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps, Michael Barrett, speaking to troops in South Korea.

Labels: DADT, military, USMC

reposted from Joe

HRC's NYers for Marriage Equality

Via JMG: WI Judge Upholds Domestic Partners

Saying the system does not violate the state's ban on same-sex marriage, a judge has upheld Wisconsin's domestic partners registry.

Dane County Circuit Judge Daniel Moeser ruled that the 2009 law does not create a legal status for partners that is identical or substantially similar to that of marriage and therefore it does not violate the constitutional ban approved by voters in 2006. “The state does not recognize domestic partnership in a way that even remotely resembles how the state recognizes marriage,” Moeser said in the ruling. “Moreover, domestic partners’ have far fewer legal rights, duties, and liabilities in comparison to the legal rights, duties, and liabilities of spouses.”

The anti-gay Christian group that brought the suit says they will now appeal to the state Supreme Court.

Labels: domestic partners, hate groups, Wisconsin

reposted from Joe

Via JMG: Marriage Is Between One Man And One Child Less Than One-Third His Age

Sixteen year-old aspiring country singer Courtney Stodden has married actor Doug Hutchinson, 51, whom you may recall played the weasely Percy Wetmore in The Green Mile. The happy couple plans a champagne toast to their nuptials in five years when the bride reaches drinking age.

(Tipped by JMG reader Blair)

Labels: acting, Hollywood, marriage equality

reposted from Joe

Via JMG: Rise Against - Make It Stop

An awesome pop-rock track against gay bullying made in collaboration with the It Gets Better Project. Featuring a cameo by Dan Savage.

Labels: bullying, Dan Savage, LGBT youth, pop music

reposted from Joe

Via Gay Politics Report: Does President Obama favor marriage equality?

President Barack Obama has not publicly announced his support for marriage equality but says that his views on the subject are evolving; some insiders say that, privately, Obama has never opposed same-sex couples getting married. The latest comments came after Dan Pfeiffer, the White House communications director, mistakenly told a convention of progressive bloggers that Obama did not personally fill out a 1996 questionnaire in which he expressed support for marriage equality. Aides said Obama believed at the time he was expressing support for civil unions, which the president continues to back.  

The New York Times (tiered subscription model) (6/18)

Via GetEqual

Across civil rights movements of the past, the freedom to marry has been a stepping stone on the path toward full legal equality. Of course, there are many other such stepping stones -- employment non-discrimination, full and open access to public accommodations, open military service, etc. -- but marriage has always provided a strategic opening for more and greater civil rights for marginalized groups.

We're on the verge of a perfect storm this week in New York and we need your help to push for a few key wins this week...

New York State is in the eye of the storm for a few key reasons:

• First, there is a marriage equality bill pending in the state Senate, but which is being held hostage by anti-LGBT forces that are using President Obama's own reticence to embrace marriage equality as a way to override the overwhelming majority of New Yorkers who support the freedom to marry.
• Second, President Obama is holding a giant LGBT fundraiser in New York City, but hasn't publicly stated that he favors the freedom to marry for LGBT folks...stating instead that his position on marriage equality is "evolving."
• And, third, New York City's Pride is this weekend -- in just a matter of days, hundreds of thousands of LGBT folks and allies will be in town to celebrate the anniversary of Stonewall and of our tradition of standing up for our rights.

It's time for the President to evolve already. And, here is our plan to help push for that to happen:

First, please sign the petition that Freedom To Marry has created, asking the President to "Say I Do" to marriage equality. There are over 111,000 signatures on the petition so far, and we want to keep adding signatures in order to keep adding pressure on the President. We'll take that message with us as we stand outside the President's fundraiser on Thursday (more below):

http://freedomtomarry.org/GetEqual

Second, help us to put more pressure on the President by following us on Twitter at @GetEQUAL. We'll be launching a Twitter campaign shortly in order to keep the pressure on and make it clear to the White House that anything less than full support for marriage equality is unacceptable. And we're joining with AMERICAblog Gay to push the President to #evolvealready over the next few days.

Third, we'll be in New York City on Thursday at the President's fundraiser and we hope you'll either join us yourself or ask your friends to join us there. You can find information on the rally at:

http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=123451884405622

We hope that, through this public pressure, we'll be able to move the President to understand that he's falling behind the majority of Americans who see marriage equality as a key civil right for LGBT Americans. Through this pressure, we hope that President Obama, before cashing those checks, will think twice about how he can help make the lives of those check writers better with just two words:

"I do."

Of course, marriage isn't the only vital piece of legislation moving through the New York legislature right now. GENDA (Gender Expression Non-Discrimination Act) passed the Assembly, but is stuck in the Senate. We encourage you to exercise your voice by making calls and adding feedback to the whip count over at Act On Principles: http://www.actonprinciples.org/gendanysenate/.

Get Out! Get Active! GetEQUAL!

Robin McGehee, Director

Via JMG: Tomorrow In Albany!

Labels: activism, Albany, marriage equality, New York state

reposted from Joe

The Juliettes "Hooray You're Gay"

HoorayYoureGay(.com) is the first international release from The Juliettes, Seattle's favorite all-woman, Pump Rock band. 100% of net proceeds will benefit equality education and at-risk gay youth. The Juliettes celebrate you.

Lixo Extraordinário (2010) - TRAILER OFICIAL

CNN - NY Gay Couple Waiting 61 Years To Marry