Baylor University's annual survey on religion reports the above levels of support for marriage equality. Unsurprisingly, the "unchurched" are far and away our best allies.Monday, September 26, 2011
Via JMG: Religion Poll On Marriage Support
Baylor University's annual survey on religion reports the above levels of support for marriage equality. Unsurprisingly, the "unchurched" are far and away our best allies.
Via JMG: NEW YORK: Gov. Andrew Cuomo Signs Landmark Bill Aiding LGBT Seniors
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo has signed a bill creating state services for LGBT senior citizens. The bill was sponsored by openly gay state Sen. Thomas Duane and openly bisexual state Assemblyman Micah Keller. The bill authorizes the replication of various state programs currently offered to traditionally underserved populations.
Via press release from Duane's office:
“Governor Cuomo has once again shown his commitment to ensuring that all New Yorkers have equal rights and protections under the law,” said Senator Duane. “This legislation is groundbreaking. For the first time, New York will recognize the unique needs of the ever growing segment of aging LGBT New Yorkers – and the services they may require in the years to come. Over the past decade, this State has gone from all but ignoring the LGBT community to enacting comprehensive LGBT hate crimes protections, providing a Sexual Orientation Non-Discrimination Act, protecting our students with strong anti-gay bullying protections in the Dignity For All Students Act, insuring our right to marry the ones we love with a Marriage Equality law, and now today taking major steps to assist elderly LGBT New Yorkers. I am proud at how far we have come in such a short amount of time.”I believe this new bill is unique to New York state. Can anybody verify that?
Via AmericaBlog Gay: DSCC fundraising off of GOP booing gay soldier
And they should. That audience made a better argument than any of us could for why the Republicans shouldn't be in power. And only two of the 9 GOP presidential candidates on stage when the audience booed a gay soldier in Iraq have said anything about it. Where is Bachmann? Where is Perry Where is Romney and Gingrich? Nothing. Make sure you sign our open letter to the GOP candidates, demanding they apologize for this blatant disrespect of our troops.
From: Guy Cecil info@dscc.org
From: Guy Cecil info@dscc.org
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 18:01:47 -0400 (EDT)
To: xxxxxx
Subject: DOA
If you saw the news from last night, you know exactly why we can’t let up the fight, even for a moment:
-- The House shoved us toward a government shutdown by passing a despicable temporary funding measure that holds disaster relief hostage unless crucial job-creating programs are slashed to the bone. Luckily, it was dead on arrival in the Senate.
-- The Republican presidential debate crowd literally BOOED a gay soldier serving in Iraq who asked a question about Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. Can you imagine if a Democratic crowd booed a deployed soldier? Not one of the candidates had the guts or heart to denounce them.
If they take the Senate, they won’t even have to hold disaster relief hostage. They could just eviscerate it. Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, reinstated. Health care reform, repealed. GOP priorities will no longer be DOA. They’ll be law. No guts. No heart.
We’re down to the wire. 8 days until our September fundraising deadline; $495,000 left to raise. It’s not just a number. If we fall short, we lose the Senate.
Can you give $5 right now? 90% of our donations come from grassroots supporters – I’m counting on you.
No way, no how can these people have complete control of government. Help stop them.
Guy Cecil
Via AmericaBlog Gay: Andrew Sullivan on the GOP booing an American soldier in combat
From Andrew:
But as I went to bed last night, the scattered boos for an American soldier in the field at any debate began to sink in. And Santorum's despicable lie in response - that repealing DADT somehow means license of gay sexual misconduct in the armed services - was intended to reduce that soldier, his life and work, to Santorum's obsession: the intrinsic evil of gay sex. Again, this is usual. Gays are used to being reduced to sexual acts rather than being seen as full human beings, like straight people, with sexuality sure, but a whole lot of other things as well.But somehow the fact that these indignities were heaped on a man risking his life to serve this country, a man ballsy enough to make that video, a man in the uniform of the United States ... well, it tells me a couple of things. It tells me that these Republicans don't actually deep down care for the troops, if that means gay troops. Their constant posturing military patriotism has its limits.
The shocking silence on the stage - the fact that no one challenged this outrage - also tells me that this kind of slur is not regarded as a big deal. When it came to it, even Santorum couldn't sanction firing all those servicemembers who are now proudly out. But that's because he was forced to focus not on his own Thomist abstractions, but on an actual person. Throughout Republican debates, gays are discussed as if we are never in the audience, never actually part of the society, never fully part of families, never worthy of even a scintilla of respect. When you boo a servicemember solely because he's gay, you are saying he is beneath contempt, that nothing he does or has done can counterweigh the vileness of his sexual orientation.
And then I think of all those gay servicemembers who have died for this country, or been wounded in battle, or been on tours year after year ... and the fury builds.
Nearly 6000 people have signed. Have you?
Via AmericaBlog Gay: Romney, Perry, Bachmann, Gingrich refuse to denounce boos of gay soldier. Johnson suggests Santorum lied.
So one GOP presidential candidate is calling Rick Santorum a liar for claiming on Fox that he couldn't hear the gay soldier being booed by the Republican audience during the presidential primary debate last week in Florida. Also, it's interesting to note that while Huntsman, Santorum and Johnson all denounced the boos, Romney, Perry, Bachmann and Gingrich are now refusing to denounce the boos.
So basically, Romney, Perry, Bachmann and Gingrich stand behind the audience's booing of a US soldier serving in combat.
[Former New Mexico Gov. Gary] Johnson added that he could hear the boos from the stage and believes that the other candidates – despite Santorum’s denial – could as well.
Businessman Herman Cain declined to go into detail about the incident saying only, “If you don’t have time to explain your whole position on that, you can very easily be taken out of context so I don’t even want to comment on that.”
Rep. Michele Bachmann’s spokeswoman Alice Stewart said in an email to ABC News, “There was booing and cheering throughout the debate – Michele didn’t comment on any of it.”
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich also declined to comment, and Ron Paul’s campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Spokespeople from Gov. Mitt Romney’s campaign did not return requests for comment, and Texas Gov. Rick Perry’s campaign had no comment either.
Make sure you sign, and send around (retweet, Facebook) our open letter from former military members calling on all the GOP candidates to apologize for not saying a word in defense of the gay American soldier who was literally booed by the GOP debate audience. Nearly 7000 people have signed. Have you?
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Via AmericaBlog Gay: Apologize!
Gay soldier being booed at Fox debate is now all over the news
UPDATE: Rick Santorum has now been forced to join Jon Huntsman in condemning the audience for booing at the GOP debate. But where are the other 7 GOP candidates who said nothing? Where is Bachmann and Gingrich and Romney and Perry?
________
Last night, during the Republican presidential debate, an American soldier serving in Iraq was booed by the audience simply for saying that he was gay, and for asking a question about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
________
Last night, during the Republican presidential debate, an American soldier serving in Iraq was booed by the audience simply for saying that he was gay, and for asking a question about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
And none of the GOP candidates on stage said a word in his defense.
Please sign on to the open letter by former Army Captains Tanya L. Domi, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Brenda S. "Sue" Fulton, Jonathan Hopkins, and former West Point cadet Katherine Miller, each of whom had a lead role in bringing down "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," demanding that all the Republican presidential candidates denounce the disrespect that was shown to soldier Stephen Hill during the Republican debate. The more signatures we get, the more the media will pressure politicians to stand up.
To the Republican presidential candidates:
Each and every one of you owes our American service members an apology.
Thursday night, during the Republican presidential debate in Florida, an American soldier serving in Iraq was booed by the audience simply for saying that he was gay, and for asking a question about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
Nine of you were on that stage, and none of you said a word.
After the debate, one lone candidate, Jon Huntsman, had the decency to speak out in defense of the soldier, saying: "You know, we’re all Americans, and the fact that he is an American who put on the uniform says something good about him."
This isn't about politics, it doesn't matter if you're a Republican or a Democrat, and it has nothing to do with where you stand on the issue of gays in the military. This is about showing an American service member a basic level of respect for serving this country.
We urge each of you to speak out against the disrespectful way in which soldier Stephen Hill was treated during your debate.
Sincerely,
Tanya L. Domi, former Army Captain
James E. Pietrangelo, II, former Army Captain
Brenda S. "Sue" Fulton, former Army Captain
Jonathan Hopkins, former Army Captain
Katherine Miller, former West Point cadet
John Aravosis, AMERICAblog
James E. Pietrangelo, II, former Army Captain
Brenda S. "Sue" Fulton, former Army Captain
Jonathan Hopkins, former Army Captain
Katherine Miller, former West Point cadet
John Aravosis, AMERICAblog
Via AmericaBlog Gay: Catholic church flips out at Obama over DOMA, DADT - lectures him about racial discrimination
Yes, the Catholic church, not satisfied with oppressing its own flock, is now branching out and attempting to pressure the Obama administration into being more anti-gay on DOMA and Don't Ask, Don't Tell.
In a long letter, fraught with hyperbole, from the US Conference of Catholic Bishops - (a bigoted organization that oddly still sits on the board of the Coalition on Human Needs, a high-powered coalition of most of the largest progressive groups in Washington, DC - one wonders if an anti-black or anti-semitic organization would be permitted to sit on their board (actually, we don't wonder, I'm sure CHN has double standards for non-gay bigots) - here's CHN's Facebook page, feel free to say hi - oh yeah, they also have the Catholic Charities bigots on their board too) - really let loose at the President over DOMA and DADT.
A few of the highlights from the Catholic bishops' letter:
I believe therefore that you would agree that every child has the right to be loved by both a mother and a father.
And I believe that every child has the right to not be raped by a Catholic priest who was already known to the church leadership, but about whom the church leadership did nothing for decades. So if they want to talk about the children, let's talk about the children.
That is why it is particularly upsetting, Mr. President, when your Administration, through the various court documents, pronouncements and policies identified in the attached analysis, attributes to those who support DOMA a motivation rooted in prejudice and bias. It is especially wrong and unfair to equate opposition to redefining marriage with either intentional or willfully ignorant racial discrimination, as your Administration insists on doing.
First, of course they're filled with hate. Second, putting aside for a moment the irony of these men lecturing Barack Obama about race, what's particularly interesting is that they must think they know more about race than Coretta Scott King, who famously equated racial discrimination and anti-gay bigotry.
More from the bishops:
Our federal government should not be presuming ill intent or moral blindness on the part of the overwhelming majority of its citizen.
Yes, God forbid the federal government assumed ill intent or moral blindness on the part of its citizens when investigating hate crimes, or racial prejudice, or anti-Semitism. The very rationale behind civil rights is the need to protect the minority from the majority. The majority of Americans had a problem with race, and a lot of them still have a problem with gays (though in varied degrees, with a lot of it improving, such as on DADT where the overwhelming majority of the American public disagreed with the Catholic Church). Maybe someone should tell the Catholic Bishops not to presume that they're speaking on behalf of the majority of Americans, because they're not even close on DADT, and not really there on DOMA either.
And here comes the truly hysterical, over the top, mary moment:
Nor should a policy disagreement over the meaning of marriage be treated by federal officials as a federal offense—but this will happen if the Justice Department‟s latest constitutional theory prevails in court. The Administration's failure to change course on this matter will, as the attached analysis indicates, precipitate a national conflict between Church and State of enormous proportions and to the detriment of both institutions.
See, the underlying problem here is that the Catholic bishops are imputing their own hatred and bigotry on to the rest of us. They assume that since they wish to destroy our lives, that we will in return destroy theirs once we're fully free.
Yeah, it doesn't really work that way. Unlike Republicans, aka the Catholic Church, Democrats don't do the world domination thing very well. We tend to favor "live and let live" rather than "live my way or die." (In other words, you're not going to find many Galileos in our closet. Can the Catholic Church claim the same? No they can't.)
It's also terribly disturbing to see the Catholic church do the very thing that we were told would never happen if a Catholic ever became president - try to impose its religion on all in the land.
The Catholic bishops are under the mistaken impression that they're my bishops too, and they're not. They represent their own church, and even there, we all know that most Catholics don't agree with much of what the church preaches on these kind of issues. But in any case, they have no right to dictate to an American president that he should make me, a Greek Orthodox, or you a Jew a Muslim or even an atheist live according to their church laws.
That's not a democracy. It's Vatican City (and also Tehran). And last time I checked, things weren't going so well in either capital.
PS I do have to hand it to the Catholic bishops. They wrote one hell of an Obama re-election pamphlet. I can just see the Obama campaign handing copies of this letter, and they will, to ever gay person who dares to suggest that the President hasn't done enough on our issues. I'm sure it wasn't their intent, but the Catholic bishops just made the President's campaign a lot of money and a lot of votes.
Via AmericaBlogGay: Anti- marriage equality crusader may have stolen money to pay for her wedding
A state lawmaker who was a central figure this year in the drama over whether Maryland would approve same-sex marriage was charged Friday with stealing campaign funds to pay for her wedding.
Charges brought by the Office of the Maryland State Prosecutor allege that Del. Tiffany T. Alston (D-Prince George’s) spent thousands of dollars of campaign contributions to pay for wedding expenses and for the salary of an employee in her law firm.
In several instances, Alston wrote herself checks from the account of “Friends of Tiffany Alston” and then cashed the checks for personal use, according to the prosecutor’s office.
First she was in favor of the marriage equality bill, then voted against it. Tool.
SeanChapin1 just uploaded a video:
My response video to the horrifically anti-gay atmosphere of the GOP Presidential debate in Florida on September 22, 2011, largely due to the crowd booing a gay soldier who recently became free from the repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don'T Tell" (DADT) policy, and Rick Santorum's frightening response.
Video produced under the fair use policy by Sean Chapin More
Friday, September 23, 2011
ViaJMG: First GOP Rep Joins DOMA Repeal Fight
The battle to repeal DOMA finally has its first Republican co-sponsor. Via Freedom To Marry: Today, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen announced that she would be the first Republican member of Congress to cosponsor the Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 1116), sponsored by Representative Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), to repeal the so-called Defense of Marriage Act. "Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen's support for this important bill confirms that equal respect for all marriages is a bipartisan, mainstream value,” said Evan Wolfson, founder and President of Freedom to Marry, the campaign to win marriage nationwide. “Working with Representatives Ros-Lehtinen and Nadler, and the Respect for Marriage Act's 124 co-sponsors, Freedom to Marry will continue to make the case to Republican and Democratic members of Congress that it's time to return the federal government to its proper role of honoring all marriages legal in the states -- without a gay exception."According to above-excerpted press release, Ros-Lehtinen's support was gained with the help of the Log Cabin Republicans. She is the most senior Republican woman in the U.S. House and was first elected to represent Miami in 1989. (Her district includes South Beach and Key West.) She is also the only GOP member of the congressional LGBT caucus.
Via JMG: Keith Olbermann Rips Rick Perry's Anti-Gay Florida Campaign Leader
Olbermann takes on Rick Perry's Florida campaign leader, who says God sends natural disasters to express displeasure with gay marriage. She can also raise the dead! SRSLY. Glory! Praise Jeebus!
(Via - Good As You)
reposted from Joe
(Via - Good As You)
reposted from Joe
Via JMG: Frothy Mix: I Never Heard Any Boos
"I condemn the people who booed that gay soldier. That soldier is serving our country, I thank him for his service to our country. I’m sure he’s doing an excellent job. I hope he is safe, and I hope he returns safely, and does his mission well. I have to admit, I seriously did not hear those boos. Had I heard them, I certainly would have commented on them. But as you know, when you’re in that sort of environment, you’re focused on the question and formulating your answer. And I just didn’t hear those couple of boos that were out there. But certainly, had I, I would have said that that was — I would have said, don’t do that, this man is serving our country, and we are to thank him for his service." - Rick Santorum, speaking on Fox News.Via AmericaBlog:
Thursday night, during the Republican presidential debate, an American soldier serving in Iraq was booed by the audience simply for saying that he was gay, and for asking a question about "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."
And none of the GOP candidates on stage said a word in his defense.
Please join former Army Captains Tanya L. Domi, James E. Pietrangelo, II, Brenda S. "Sue" Fulton, Jonathan Hopkins, and former West Point cadet Katherine Miller in signing an open letter demanding that all the Republican presidential candidates denounce the disrespect that was shown to soldier Stephen Hill during the Republican debate.
Click here to watch the shocking video, and to read and sign the open letter.
The media is all over this story now, and everyone is talking about the tacit silence of the GOP candidates. If enough of you join Tanya, Jim, Sue, Jonathan and Katherine in signing the open letter, we have a real chance at publicly shaming each and every one of the candidates into doing the right thing.
As you already know, this isn't about politics, it doesn't matter if you're a Republican or a Democrat, and it has nothing to do with where you stand on the issue of gays in the military. This is about showing an American service member a basic level of respect for serving this country.
Please join me in signing the open letter, signed by four former military members and a former West Point cadet, asking the Republican presidential candidates to speak out against the disrespectful way in which soldier Stephen Hill was treated during last Thursday night's debate. Click here to watch the video and to sign.
Thanks so much,
John Aravosis, AMERICAblog
Via Ben Betz, People For the American Way:
Perhaps the only thing scarier than the Republican presidential candidates are the right-wing crowds at their debates. At last night's Fox News debate, the crowd actually booed a gay soldier who asked a question about Don't Ask Don't Tell! At the first debate, mention of Rick Perry's record-setting number of state executions as governor drew huge applause. And the crowd at the first official Tea Party debate cheered just as raucously for the suggestion that the way to deal with a sick person without health insurance is to "let him die." Of course, in all these instances, the candidates said nothing to dissuade the crowd.
Don't let these people pick the next President! We need your help now to keep Perry, Romney and Bachmann OUT of the White House. Renew your support today and your donation will be matched dollar-for-dollar, DOUBLING your impact!
Don't let these people pick the next President! We need your help now to keep Perry, Romney and Bachmann OUT of the White House. Renew your support today and your donation will be matched dollar-for-dollar, DOUBLING your impact!
Via JMG: GOP Debates Recap
Three major GOP debates so far and what have we seen?
CHEERS for the death penalty.
CHEERS for letting people die without insurance.
BOOS for active duty gay soldiers.
All the blah-blah-blah from the candidates - almost ignored. It's the audience reactions that keep garnering the press. It's the unbridled gleeful hatred of the Tea Party that keeps earning all those cable news video clips.
'Barb' posted September 16, 2011 letter to U.S. National Spiritual Assembly regarding "homosexual lifestyle"
'Barb' posted September 16, 2011 letter to U.S. National Spiritual Assembly regarding "homosexual lifestyle"
Dear Baha'i Friends,
Dear Baha'i Friends,
In your January 3, 2011 letter to the American Baha'is, you shared the following guidance from the Baha'i Universal House of Justice:
The purpose of the Faith of Baha'u'llah is the realization of the organic unity of the entire human race, and Baha'is are enjoined to eliminate from their lives all forms of prejudice and to manifest respect towards all. Therefore, to regard those with a homosexual orientation with prejudice or disdain would be against the spirit of the Faith.
The term “homosexual lifestyle,” which has been used by both individual Baha'is and Baha'i institutions, exemplifies regarding homosexuals with prejudice and disdain, as it is always used in a negative sense. The term has no inherent meaning and makes no more sense than “heterosexual lifestyle.”
Consider the infinite variety of “lifestyles” of the heterosexual: bar-hopper or tee-totaler, sexually promiscuous or celibate, monogamous or advocate of free love, drug addict or avoider of even an aspirin, organic gardener or fast-food fan, greedy or philanthropic, convicted criminal or saint of church/synagogue/mosque, religious or atheist, hardworking or slothful, morally degenerate or of high moral fiber, etc.
It is apparent that the term “heterosexual lifestyle” has no meaning. The word “heterosexual” refers to one's sexual orientation, the word “lifestyle” to one's habit of living. The term “homosexual lifestyle” is just as meaningless, for the variety of lifestyles of homosexuals is just as great as for heterosexuals – it would make as much sense to refer to a “brunette lifestyle” or “left-handed lifestyle.”
In addition, the term “homosexual lifestyle” has the effect of making gays/lesbians feel as if their sexual identity is supposed to be something trivial which can be discarded at will, as one would a suit of clothes – it trivializes the identity of a significant segment of the world's population. It's like saying to Black or Jewish people that their identity is a trivial thing.
In summary, “heterosexual” and “homosexual” are terms denoting a person's sexual orientation, as the Universal House of Justice acknowledges. To associate one or the other with a particular “lifestyle” is unfair.
You should know that this letter will be posted on the website “Gay/Lesbian Baha'i Story Project” because it deals with a subject of interest to many of our readers, and that any reply will be posted as well, for the same reason.
Respectfully,
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)