A personal blog by a graying (mostly Anglo with light African-American roots) gay left leaning liberal progressive married college-educated Buddhist Baha'i BBC/NPR-listening Professor Emeritus now following the Dharma in Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Tuesday, September 12, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Paying the Bills, Ethically
If
we are embarking on a spiritual path, we need to live our lives
ethically, and this means ensuring that we do as little harm as possible
to anyone or anything while we’re earning our daily bread.
—Krishnan Venkatesh, “Why Right Livelihood Isn't Just About Your Day Job”
—Krishnan Venkatesh, “Why Right Livelihood Isn't Just About Your Day Job”
Monday, September 11, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: The Treasure of Hope
When we possess the treasure of hope, we can draw forth our inner potential and strength. A person of hope can always advance.
—Daisaku Ikeda, “On Hardship & Hope”
—Daisaku Ikeda, “On Hardship & Hope”
Sunday, September 10, 2017
Via Ram Dass
The object of our love is love itself. It is the inner light in everyone and everything.
- Ram Dass -
Via Daily Dharma: Dealing with Delusion
Acknowledging
our delusion is a very important step, but just to leave it at that
will not suffice. There’s no greater foolishness than to spend one’s
lifetime acknowledging that one is deluded and yet doing nothing
whatsoever about it.
—Chokyi Nyima Rinpoche, “Renunciation”
—Chokyi Nyima Rinpoche, “Renunciation”
Saturday, September 9, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Trading Candy for Gold
In trading the pleasures of an ordinary life for a meditative life, you’re trading candy for gold.
—Thanissaro Bhikkhu, “Skillful Shelter”
—Thanissaro Bhikkhu, “Skillful Shelter”
Friday, September 8, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Use Boredom to Your Advantage
Boredom
is like having to deal with fear, anger, or indeed craving, or any
other negative mental state. It is an opportunity to experience the
energy that is usually drained away by distractions.
—Sangharakshita, “Staying with Boredom”
—Sangharakshita, “Staying with Boredom”
Thursday, September 7, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Be Yourself—It's Your Only Option
The only thing you really ever have to offer another person is your own state of being.
—Ram Dass, “Tuning”
—Ram Dass, “Tuning”
Wednesday, September 6, 2017
Via Ram Dass / Words of Wisdom - September 6, 2017
Do
what you can on this plane to relieve suffering by constantly working on
yourself to be an instrument for the cessation of suffering.
To me, that's what the emerging game is all about.
To me, that's what the emerging game is all about.
- Ram Dass -
Via Daily Dharma: How Meditation Helps You Let Go
By
creating a sense of background support through the calming and stilling
of the mind, meditation makes possible the compassionate conditions
that allow clinging to be released.
—Mark Epstein, “What Changes?”
—Mark Epstein, “What Changes?”
Tuesday, September 5, 2017
Time for a Metta // Tempo para um Metta
I’d like you to be safe
I’d like you to be healthy
I’d like you to be happy
I’d like you to be at ease in the world
Eu gostaria que você estivesse seguro
Eu gostaria que você estivesse saudável
Eu gostaria que você estivesse feliz
Eu gostaria que você estivesse à vontade no mundo
Via Rick Heller / Secular Meditation
Via Daily Dharma: On the Impermanence of Desire
As
a simple experiment, the next time you have some wanting or desire in
the mind, investigate what the wanting feels like and then notice how it
feels when the wanting passes away. Given the great law of
impermanence, it always will.
—Joseph Goldstein, “The End of Suffering”
—Joseph Goldstein, “The End of Suffering”
Monday, September 4, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Karma: The Best Investment
Don’t worry so much about social security. Finance your karmic security instead.
—Andrew Holecek, “The Supreme Contemplation”
—Andrew Holecek, “The Supreme Contemplation”
Sunday, September 3, 2017
Via Patheos/ Queers: Our Worth is Independent of Theology
This week a conservative evangelical Christian group released the “Nashville Statement,” a transparently homophobic and transphobic screed designed to give theological cover to those who wish to discriminate and hate in the name of God. Its 14 Articles are a sustained assault on the dignity of LGBTQIA+ people, each one an ethical monstrosity elevating some people’s interpretation of scripture over other people’s right to live as they wish.
The articles include the following:
In response, various more liberal Christian groups and individuals have released counter statements. I enjoyed the one by fellow Patheos blogger Nadia Bolz-Weber (the Denver Statement) which, while offering a more affirming view of LGBTQIA+ persons, also questions whether God has arms.
I am, of course, heartened that some Christians have the heart to see through the Nashville Statement’s hateful nonsense. Honestly, though, these Christian counter-statements miss the most important point: we must never ground human dignity in any text or teaching, any scripture or sacrament. We must not look to the Bible, or the teachings of Jesus, or any other external source in order to “justify” the worth and dignity of human beings. Doing so will always jeopardize the most marginalized people, because we human beings cannot help but interpret texts and teachings in ways inflected by the prejudices of our current culture. Once we locate the source of people’s dignity outside people – LGBTQIA+ people are worthy of respect because it says so here in my book – it is only a matter of time before someone finds a way to reinterpret that source in such a way that it does not grant some people dignity.
This is a fundamental and inescapable problem with moral systems which look to privileged texts to tell us what is right or wrong: they are only as secure as a given interpretation of the text. And when you’re dealing with the Bible – a text with an inescapable homophobic history and, at best, defensible homophobic interpretations – it’s crystal clear that there is no secure basis for the dignity of LGBTQIA+ people to be found there.
The articles include the following:
WE DENY that God has designed marriage to be a homosexual, polygamous, or polyamorous relationship.
WE AFFIRM that divinely ordained differences between male and female reflect God’s original creation design and are meant for human good and human flourishing.
WE DENY that adopting a homosexual or transgender self-conception is consistent with God’s holy purposes in creation and redemption.
WE DENY that sexual attraction for the same sex is part of the natural goodness of God’s original creation, or that it puts a person outside the hope of the gospel.
WE AFFIRM that it is sinful to approve of homosexual immorality or transgenderism and that such approval constitutes an essential departure from Christian faithfulness and witness.And it continues.
In response, various more liberal Christian groups and individuals have released counter statements. I enjoyed the one by fellow Patheos blogger Nadia Bolz-Weber (the Denver Statement) which, while offering a more affirming view of LGBTQIA+ persons, also questions whether God has arms.
I am, of course, heartened that some Christians have the heart to see through the Nashville Statement’s hateful nonsense. Honestly, though, these Christian counter-statements miss the most important point: we must never ground human dignity in any text or teaching, any scripture or sacrament. We must not look to the Bible, or the teachings of Jesus, or any other external source in order to “justify” the worth and dignity of human beings. Doing so will always jeopardize the most marginalized people, because we human beings cannot help but interpret texts and teachings in ways inflected by the prejudices of our current culture. Once we locate the source of people’s dignity outside people – LGBTQIA+ people are worthy of respect because it says so here in my book – it is only a matter of time before someone finds a way to reinterpret that source in such a way that it does not grant some people dignity.
This is a fundamental and inescapable problem with moral systems which look to privileged texts to tell us what is right or wrong: they are only as secure as a given interpretation of the text. And when you’re dealing with the Bible – a text with an inescapable homophobic history and, at best, defensible homophobic interpretations – it’s crystal clear that there is no secure basis for the dignity of LGBTQIA+ people to be found there.
We need to take a Humanistic turn, as a culture. We need to state, quite simply, that respect for the dignity of persons is a bedrock ethical principle, grounded in the very nature of people themselves, requiring no external justification. In response to abominations like the Nashville Statement we must not say “We have a better interpretation of scripture than yours,” or “We understand God better than you do” (responses which make human dignity a matter of interpretation), but “No God or scripture can undermine the inherent dignity of a human person.”
The Nashville Statement is not only wicked, but it is irrelevant: that is the most important point.
Enjoy my writing? Support me on Patreon!
Read more at http://www.patheos.com/blogs/templeofthefuture/2017/09/queers-worth-independent-theology/#j6JWmPWrxuggHP3i.01
Via Ram Dass / Words of Wisdom - September 3, 2017
The transformative process is our job, so that we are not ruled by fear but by love.
- Ram Dass -
Via Daily Dharma: You Are Your Own Best Proof
For
practicing Buddhists, why would you need third-person proof to show
that your own practice is helping you? In the end, when it comes to
spiritual practice, you are your own best proof.
—Thupten Jinpa Langri, “Under One Umbrella”
—Thupten Jinpa Langri, “Under One Umbrella”
Saturday, September 2, 2017
Via Daily Dharma: Planting Seeds for the Future
Life
is a series of mind moments, each one a new creation. Every moment we
inherit something from our past, transform it in our present experience,
and thereby seed the consequences of our future.
—Andrew Olendzki, “A Tough But Not Impossible Act to Follow”
—Andrew Olendzki, “A Tough But Not Impossible Act to Follow”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)