Wednesday, July 16, 2025

Via Dhamma Wheel | Right Speech: Refraining from Malicious Speech

 

RIGHT SPEECH
Refraining from Malicious Speech
Malicious speech is unhealthy. Refraining from malicious speech is healthy. (MN 9) Abandoning malicious speech, one refrains from malicious speech. One does not repeat there what one has heard here to the detriment of these, or repeat here what one has heard there to the detriment of those. One unites those who are divided, is a promoter of friendships, and speaks words that promote concord. (DN 1) One practices thus: “Others may speak maliciously, but I shall abstain from malicious speech.” (MN 8)

Disputes occur when a person is deceitful and fraudulent. Such a person dwells disrespectful and undeferential towards others, causing harm and unhappiness for many. If you see any such root of a dispute either in yourself or externally, you should strive to abandon it. And if you do not see any such root of dispute either in yourself or externally, you should practice in such a way that it does not erupt in the future. (MN 104)
Reflection
Arguments and disputes do not come from external circumstances, but from the internal qualities of people’s minds. When there is a competing interest, for example, it might be negotiated peacefully and fairly, or it might escalate into a hateful argument and even become violent. The difference lies in what kind of internal mental and emotional states are brought to the table by both participants. We can influence how this unfolds. 
Daily Practice
Take special care to refrain from being deceitful or fraudulent in all of your dealings with other people. And when other people are exhibiting these qualities, try hard not to be provoked into doing the same. These practices in daily life require a regular habit of being tuned in to the workings of your own mind and being sensitive to the extent your own experience is impacted by the mental and emotional qualities of others.
Tomorrow: Reflecting upon Verbal Action
One week from today: Refraining from Harsh Speech

Share your thoughts and join the conversation on social media
#DhammaWheel

Questions?
 Visit the Dhamma Wheel orientation page.
Tricycle is a nonprofit and relies on your support to keep its wheels turning.
© 2025 Tricycle Foundation
89 5th Ave, New York, NY 10003

Tuesday, July 15, 2025

Via PBS News -- Brazil’s Bolsonaro describes coup plot trial as a ‘witch hunt’ as prosecutors call for guilty verdict


 

Dra Yang Project - Plegaria a Amitaba (HD)

Via FB


 

Via FB


 

Via FB


 

Via FB


 

Via Tricycle \\ From the Academy : Sutras

 

JULY 2025
From the Academy
Welcome to From the Academy, a monthly newsletter for Premium subscribers offering a scholarly take on topics in Buddhist thought and practice. Each issue highlights a key theme and offers additional resources for in-depth exploration. This month, we look at how sutras serve as both sacred speech and sites of tension.
Sutras
A Sanskrit manuscript of the Lotus Sutra in South Turkestan Brahmi script.
What Is a Sutra?

In South Asian religious traditions, a sutra is a concise formulation of philosophical or moral teachings. In Buddhism, the term sutra (Skt.: sūtra; Pali: sutta, lit. “thread”) specifically refers to discourses that present the direct utterances of Shakyamuni or other buddhas, bodhisattvas, or enlightened disciples. While all sutras are scriptures, not all scriptures are sutras. Their authority depends less on historical authorship than on being recognized as aligning with the Buddhist understanding of reality and as buddhavacana, the “word of the Buddha,” a category that often depends on how a given community defines authentic Buddhist practice.

Authenticity and Ambiguity

Sutras challenge modern notions of authorship. The earliest texts were orally transmitted for centuries before being written down around the 1st century CE, as the story goes. Although there is considerable uncertainty about the language the Buddha spoke, all existing early sutras are, to some extent, translations. Mahayana sutras emerged soon after, often through visions or rediscovery, and yet many communities still accepted them as buddhavacana. Disputes over which texts qualified helped shape canons and define sectarian boundaries.

Language itself has long been treated with ambivalence in Buddhist thought. The Harvard professor Ryuichi Abé observes that Buddhist traditions rely on sacred words even as they question whether words can truly express truth. Language conveys the dharma but can also distort it. The Buddha initially hesitated to teach, fearing misunderstanding, but he chose speech over silence. Nagarjuna’s doctrine of two truths captures this tension: Conventional language must point beyond itself. Sutras are built on this paradox—revered as expressions of ultimate truth, and yet aware of language’s limits. This led many teachers, especially those in Chan lineages, to rhetorically reject scriptural reliance while drawing from the sutras on their path to realization.


Too Many Scriptures

The sheer number and diversity of sutras and other scriptures steered many traditions to narrow their focus. Chinese schools, such as Tiantai and Huayan, developed doctrinal systems around just one or two key texts. Pure Land traditions centered on a few Sukhāvatī sutras. Nichiren Buddhism went further, asserting that chanting the Lotus Sutra’s title was itself sufficient for liberation. These developments reflected the recognition that no individual or school could fully encompass the immensity of the teachings in the Buddhist canons. Some modern movements have even created new scriptures in vernacular languages, setting aside classical sutras as inaccessible or less relevant to modern concerns.
A contemporary scripture recitation machine that chants mantras, dharinis, names of buddhas, sutras, and several core Mahayana texts.
Beyond Reading

Sutras have long been more than texts for study: They’ve been chanted, memorized, copied, enshrined, and even consumed. Copying by hand or possessing a sutra was—and still is—believed to generate merit or offer protection. In the Dunhuang cave library, numerous copies of Pure Land sutras attest to their ritual use. Sutras have been worn as amulets, put inside statues, carried on pilgrimages, installed in temples, inscribed in prayer wheels, and now played on chanting devices. In these performative contexts, a sutra’s presence outweighs its meaning.

Why Sutras Still Matter

In today’s media-saturated world of dharma talks and curated teachings, sutras are often encountered secondhand, if at all. But for much of Buddhist history, they were a significant source of inspiration and inquiry. As author Karen Armstrong reminds us, scripture is not literal history or systematic philosophy but sacred art—a performative and interpretive medium meant to transform. Rather than passive consumption, traditional models emphasized recitation, listening, reflection, and meditation. But the easiest way to understand what a sutra is? Read one.
Recommended Material
Follow Us

               
© 2021 Tricycle Foundation
89 5th Ave, New York, NY 10003

Via Daily Dharma: Life Reflects the Mind

 

Browse our online courses »
Life Reflects the Mind

Life is a reflection of the quality of the mind. If you really understand the mind, you understand the world. 

Sayadaw U Tejaniya, “The Art of Investigation”


CLICK HERE TO READ THE ARTICLE

Practices I Find Helpful in the Face of Suffering
By the Dalai Lama
His Holiness provides practical advice for overcoming despair and hatred when faced with adversity.
Read more »

Honeygiver Among the Dogs
Directed by Samuel Stefan
This month’s Film Club pick follows the investigation of a missing nun in a remote region of Bhutan. Detective Kinley goes undercover and enters a risky alliance with his only suspect, a mysterious and alluring young woman named Choden, known as the village “demoness.” 
Watch now »

Via Dhamma Wheel | Right Intention: Cultivating Compassion

 

TRICYCLE      COURSE CATALOG      SUPPORT      DONATE
RIGHT INTENTION
Cultivating Compassion
Whatever you intend, whatever you plan, and whatever you have a tendency toward, that will become the basis upon which your mind is established. (SN 12.40) Develop meditation on compassion, for when you develop meditation on compassion, any cruelty will be abandoned. (MN 62)

The near enemy of compassion is ordinary sorrow. (Vm 9.99)
Reflection
Just as physical pleasure and pain are natural and inevitable aspects of human experience, the same is true of mental pleasure and pain. Sorrow can be seen as a form of mental pain, and it is natural to feel such pain, for example, with the death of a loved one. Compassion is also accompanied by sorrow, but it is not ordinary sorrow; it is a higher sorrow, raised beyond the personal to the level of a universal emotion.
Daily Practice
Allow yourself to open to the suffering of another person; there is plenty of opportunity for this these days. See if you can discern a difference between feeling sorry for them and feeling sorrow on account of their pain. See if you can feel the difference between a personal sorrow and a universal sorrow. Practice opening to the suffering of others on this broader, more universal level of experience and meaning.
Tomorrow: Refraining from Malicious Speech
One week from today: Cultivating Appreciative Joy

Share your thoughts and join the conversation on social media
#DhammaWheel

Questions?
 Visit the Dhamma Wheel orientation page.
Tricycle is a nonprofit and relies on your support to keep its wheels turning.
© 2025 Tricycle Foundation
89 5th Ave, New York, NY 10003