How religion helped win marriage equality
Marriage
equality advocates engaged people of faith and religious leaders in
successful campaigns to win ballot initiatives this year, a turnaround
from four years ago when social conservatives dominated religious
discussions over California's Proposition 8. A Washington state
coalition distributed thousands of buttons bearing the message, "Another
Person of Faith Approves R. 74," sparking conversations in which
proponents were trained to speak about the issue in terms of love and
commitment rather than "gay rights." Ross Murray, director of religion,
faith and values at the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation,
helped train thousands of "conversationalists" to speak about the issue
and their own faith, and to listen intently to those who described their
difficulties supporting marriage equality. “All of us like to be
listened to," Murray said. CNN/Belief blog
A personal blog by a graying (mostly Anglo with light African-American roots) gay left leaning liberal progressive married college-educated Buddhist Baha'i BBC/NPR-listening Professor Emeritus now following the Dharma in Minas Gerais, Brasil.
Friday, November 30, 2012
JMG Editorial Of The Day:
From Tom Goldstein at SCOTUSblog:
Reposted from Joe
At their Conference today, the Justices will consider petitions raising federal constitutional issues related to same-sex marriage. These are the most significant cases these nine Justices have ever considered, and probably that they will ever decide.Read the full essay.
I have never before seen cases that I believed would be discussed two hundred years from now. Bush v. Gore and Obamacare were relative pipsqueaks. The government’s assertion of the power to prohibit a loving couple to marry, or to refuse to recognize such a marriage, is profound. So is the opposite claim that five Justices can read the federal Constitution to strip the people of the power to enact the laws governing such a foundational social institution.
The cases present a profound test of the Justices’ judgment. The plaintiffs’ claims are rooted in the fact that these laws rest on an irrational and invidious hatred, enshrined in law. On the other hand, that describes some moral judgments. The Constitution does not forbid every inequality, and the people must correct some injustices (even some grave ones) themselves, legislatively.
The striking feature of these cases – not present in any others I have ever seen – is that that they would have been decided by the Justices’ predecessors one way and would be decided by the Justices’ successors another way.
Labels: LGBT History, LGBT rights, SCOTUS
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 30, 2012
Great Compassion
The
virtues of great compassion are infinite; they could be expounded upon
forever without exhausting them, but it boils down to this: Whoever has
great compassion can extinguish all obstructions caused by past actions
and can fulfill all virtues; no principle cannot be understood, no path
cannot be practiced, no knowledge not attained, no virtue not developed.
|
- Zen Master Torei, "Great Compassion"
Thursday, November 29, 2012
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 29, 2012
Freedom of Heart
Sometimes
suffering comes through clinging to certain emotional pain or certain
stories; sometimes through not recognizing emptiness, the evanescence of
life, that nothing can be claimed as I or mine. The point of dharma
practice is to pay attention to where there is suffering, see the
clinging and identification, and release it to find a freedom of heart.
|
- Jack Kornfield, "The Sure Heart’s Release"
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 28, 2012
A Radical Challenge
The
Buddha presented a radical challenge to the way we see the world, both
the world that was seen two millennia ago and the world that is seen
today. What he taught is not different, it is not an alternative, it is
the opposite. That the path that we think will lead us to happiness
leads instead to sorrow. That what we believe is true is instead false.
That what we imagine to be real is unreal. A certain value lies in
remembering that challenge from time to time.
|
- Donald S. Lopez, "The Scientific Buddha"
Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 27, 2012
An Honest, Enlightened Society
Enlightened
society is not an idealized environment. It's an environment that
actually accepts the imperfections of humanity and encourages you to
open your heart and mind and work with other people and situations as
they are. Enlightened society is one in which, as you make friends with
yourself, your communication with other people gets clearer, more
direct, more honest.
|
- Pema Chödrön, "No Place to Hide"
Via Buddhism on Beliefnet:
Daily Buddhist Wisdom | |||
|
Monday, November 26, 2012
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 26, 2012
The Necessity of Love
There
is no denying that consideration of others is worthwhile. There is no
denying that our happiness is inextricably bound up with the happiness
of others. There is no denying that if society suffers, we ourselves
suffer. Nor is there any denying that the more our hearts and minds are
afflicted with ill-will, the more miserable we become. Thus we can
reject everything else: religion, ideology, all received wisdom. But we
cannot escape the necessity of love and compassion.
|
- H.H. the Dalai Lama, "Consider Yourself a Tourist"
Sunday, November 25, 2012
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 25, 2012
Shedding Self-Protective Clinging
Too
often Buddhist 'nonattachment' is misconstrued as 'non-loving.' The
purpose of Buddhist practice is not to 'renounce' our families or
community, but to shed habits of self-protective clinging that prevent
us from loving them more unconditionally, powerfully, enjoyably.
|
- Lama John Makransky, "Family Practice"
Friday, November 23, 2012
Via JMG: Uganda May Vote On Anti-Gay Bill Today
Earlier this month we learned that Uganda's infamous "Kill The Gays" bill was being pushed to a vote as a "Christmas gift to Christians." Alerts went out yesterday that the bill may be voted upon as soon as today. This morning the BBC reported a claim the the death penalty has been been dropped from the legislation.
A committee of Ugandan MPs has endorsed the proposed Anti-Homosexuality Bill but dropped the death penalty provision, an MP has told the BBC. MP Medard Segona said "substantial amendments" had been made to the bill but said he was not allowed to reveal further details. Speaker of parliament Rebecca Kadaga recently said the bill would be passed as a "Christmas gift" to its advocates. Homosexual acts are illegal in Uganda - this bill increases the penalties.Box Turtle Bulletin blogger Jim Burroway is suspicious of these claims because Ugandan legislators have lied about that in the past.
Foreign donors have threatened to cut aid if gay rights are not respected. The bill, tabled by MP David Bahati, proposes longer jail terms for homosexual acts, including a life sentence in certain circumstances. In its original form, those convicted of "aggravated homosexuality" - defined as when one of the participants is a minor, HIV-positive, disabled or a "serial offender" - faced the death penalty. Such offences would now be punished with life imprisonment, it is understood.
The original bill also prohibited the "promotion" of gay rights and called for the punishment of anyone who "funds or sponsors homosexuality" or "abets homosexuality". Mr Bahati has previously said that the death penalty provision would be dropped but this has not been confirmed until now. Mr Segona, who is on the Legal and Parliamentary committee of Uganda's parliament, told the BBC: "I can confirm it has been dropped."
WBS Television in Uganda late yesterday posted another report on YouTube featuring statements by members of the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee, which is charged with marking up the Anti-Homosexuality Bill with recommended changes. There are a few troubling aspects to the report. First, the reporter claims that the death penalty has been removed for “homosexuality acts with minors,” which sounds very suspiciously like several other previous reports, later proven to be false, that the death penalty had been removed. The last time we heard that line, we would quickly learn that the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs committee, in fact, had not removed the death penalty from the bill, but instead had simply obfuscated the death penalty’s presence in the bill. A complete explanation can be found here.All Out's petition campaign against the bill has over 160,000 signatures already. Add your name.
Via JMG: NBC Nixed Marriage Ad By Chelsea Clinton
Chelsea Clinton recorded a spot in support of Washington state's Referendum 74 but NBC News prevented its airing because she works for them as a journalist. Chris Geidner reports at Buzzfeed:
Clinton, a vocal proponent of marriage equality, cut the video for a group supporting the Washington state measure, as well as a second video for another group. But NBC, for which Clinton works as a "special correspondent" since last November, "scuttled" the campaign, sources familiar with the ads said. In the weeks before the November elections — where voters in Maine, Maryland, Minnesota and Washington voted on measures relating to same-sex couples’ marriage rights — such prominent support would have been heavily sought. Clinton had supported efforts toward the legislative passage of marriage equality in New York, going so far as to attend and participate in a phone-banking effort in Manhattan before the legislature approved the bill in June 2011.
Labels: Chelsea Clinton, journalism, NBC, Washington state
Via JMG: UN Condemns Gay Death Penalty
Yesterday the United Nations approved a resolution that condemns the killing of LGBT persons either by governments or via "extrajudicial" means such as hate crimes. Via press release from the International Gay & Lesbian Human Rights Commission:
An international coalition of organizations dedicated to human rights celebrated yesterday’s historic vote in the Third Committee of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) to pass resolution condemning extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions. The vote reversed the events of 2010 when the same body voted to strip the resolution of reference to "sexual orientation." The UNGA also expanded upon its commitment to the universality of human rights by including "gender identity" for the first time in the resolution’s history. The resolution, which is introduced biennially in the Third Committee, urges States to protect the right to life of all people, including by calling upon States to investigate killings based on discriminatory grounds. It was introduced by the Government of Sweden and co-sponsored by 34 states from around the world.IGLHRC notes that the United Arab Emirates attempted to strip "sexual orientation" from the resolution on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, just as they did two years ago. (See the photo above for the vote tally on that amendment.) They add: "Another failed effort, led by the Holy See, would have stripped all specific references to groups at high risk for execution; however it was never formally introduced."
The governments of the United States, Brazil, and many others spoke in favor of the resolution. IGLHRC reports that Egypt "spoke frequently" in opposition. Japan broke its long silence on the issue with this declaration: "We cannot tolerate any killings of persons because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. Our delegation voted against the proposed amendment to this paragraph because we think it is meaningful to mention such killings from the perspective of protecting the rights of LGBT people."
Read the full resolution here.
Labels: Brazil, death penalty, Egypt, gay death penalty, hate crimes, IGLHRC, Islam, Japan, religion, United Nations
Via Tricycle Daily Dharma:
Tricycle Daily Dharma November 23, 2012
Spiritual Consumerism
Spiritual
experience and goods can certainly reinforce a consuming mind, too, and
it is no surprise to see this happening in a consumer culture.
Marketers are successfully targeting spiritual consumers as a market
niche and figuring out exactly what fulfills their self-centered
yearnings. How many of these products are necessary for spiritual
enlightenment? Probably not one.
|
- Stephanie Kaza, "Ego in the Shopping Cart"
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)